These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29513611)

  • 1. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Effects of Demands on Hazard Detection Performance.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):474-487. PubMed ID: 30307760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Boring But Demanding: Using Secondary Tasks to Counter the Driver Vigilance Decrement for Partially Automated Driving.
    Mishler S; Chen J
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1798-1811. PubMed ID: 37187161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
    Wandtner B; Schömig N; Schmidt G
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29617161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatigue and voluntary utilization of automation in simulated driving.
    Neubauer C; Matthews G; Langheim L; Saxby D
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):734-46. PubMed ID: 23156619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
    Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. This Is Your Brain on Autopilot 2.0: The Influence of Practice on Driver Workload and Engagement During On-Road, Partially Automated Driving.
    McDonnell AS; Crabtree KW; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2025-2040. PubMed ID: 37750743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.
    Jarosch O; Bellem H; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1186-1199. PubMed ID: 30657711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vigilance and Automation Dependence in Operation of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS): A Simulation Study.
    Wohleber RW; Matthews G; Lin J; Szalma JL; Calhoun GL; Funke GJ; Chiu CP; Ruff HA
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):488-505. PubMed ID: 30265579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    Vogelpohl T; Kühn M; Hummel T; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vigilance Decrement During On-Road Partially Automated Driving Across Four Systems.
    Biondi FN; McDonnell AS; Mahmoodzadeh M; Jajo N; Balakumar Balasingam ; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jul; ():187208231189658. PubMed ID: 37496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.