These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29514380)

  • 1. [Evaluation of Changes in Corneal Biomechanics in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis].
    Zimmermann N; Brandt S; Brünner J; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2019 Jun; 236(6):806-815. PubMed ID: 29514380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals.
    Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of diabetes mellitus on corneal biomechanics and measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Scheler A; Spoerl E; Boehm AG
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):e447-51. PubMed ID: 22691299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].
    Hager A; Schroeder B; Sadeghi M; Grossherr M; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun; 104(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 17587093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry.
    Oncel B; Dinc U; Orge F; Yalvac B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):936-41. PubMed ID: 19882585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methods of measuring intraocular pressure independently of central corneal thickness].
    Hager A; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2008 Sep; 105(9):840-4. PubMed ID: 18438633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.
    Çankaya AB; Kan S; Kizilgul M; Tokmak A; Inanc M; Caliskan M; Beyazyildiz E; Açar U; Delibaşı T
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 37(3):519-524. PubMed ID: 27423457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.
    Zhang Y; Bian A; Hang Q; Li L; Zhang S; Cheng G; Zhou Q
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):749-756. PubMed ID: 36958304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multimodal ophthalmic analysis in patients with systemic sclerosis using ocular response analyzer, corneal topography and specular microscopy.
    Mayali H; Altinisik M; Sencan S; Pirildar T; Kurt E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):287-296. PubMed ID: 31564047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Costin BR; Fleming GP; Weber PA; Mahmoud AM; Roberts CJ
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 23603825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects.
    Oncel B; Dinc UA; Gorgun E; Yalvaç BI
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):798-803. PubMed ID: 19787600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
    Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.