135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29514559)
1. Reversed Depth in Anticorrelated Random-Dot Stereograms and the Central-Peripheral Difference in Visual Inference.
Zhaoping L; Ackermann J
Perception; 2018 Jan; ():301006618758571. PubMed ID: 29514559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-reversed binocular dot-pairs in random-dot stereograms for depth perception in central visual field: Probing the dynamics of feedforward-feedback processes in visual inference.
Zhaoping L
Vision Res; 2021 Sep; 186():124-139. PubMed ID: 34091397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disparity detection in anticorrelated stereograms.
Cumming BG; Shapiro SE; Parker AJ
Perception; 1998; 27(11):1367-77. PubMed ID: 10505181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
Cumming BG; Parker AJ
Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
Henriksen S; Cumming BG; Read JC
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rejection of false matches for binocular correspondence in macaque visual cortical area V4.
Tanabe S; Umeda K; Fujita I
J Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 24(37):8170-80. PubMed ID: 15371518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparity Sensitivity and Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex Areas.
La Chioma A; Bonhoeffer T; Hübener M
J Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 40(46):8883-8899. PubMed ID: 33051348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EEG response in humans for frequency-tagged anticorrelated random-dot stereograms: Increased coherency and alpha oscillations.
Derzsi Z
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():909225. PubMed ID: 35968391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust natural depth for anticorrelated random dot stereogram for edge stimuli, but minimal reversed depth for embedded circular stimuli, irrespective of eccentricity.
Hibbard PB; Asher JM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274566. PubMed ID: 36137132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A relative frame of reference underlies reversed depth perception in anticorrelated random-dot stereograms.
Aoki SC; Shiozaki HM; Fujita I
J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):17. PubMed ID: 29071354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.
Cogan AI; Lomakin AJ; Rossi AF
Vision Res; 1993 Sep; 33(14):1959-75. PubMed ID: 8249313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disparity in Context: Understanding how monocular image content interacts with disparity processing in human visual cortex.
Duan Y; Thatte J; Yaklovleva A; Norcia AM
Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118139. PubMed ID: 33964460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-matching: a modified cross-correlation underlying threshold energy model and match-based depth perception.
Doi T; Fujita I
Front Comput Neurosci; 2014; 8():127. PubMed ID: 25360107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can random-dot stereograms serve as a model for the perception of depth in relation to real three-dimensional objects?
Bishop PO
Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(10):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8762764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unconscious adaptation: a new illusion of depth induced by stimulus features without depth.
Hayashi R; Miyawaki Y; Maeda T; Tachi S
Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2773-82. PubMed ID: 14568094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Flip Tilt Illusion: Visible in Peripheral Vision as Predicted by the Central-Peripheral Dichotomy.
Zhaoping L
Iperception; 2020; 11(4):2041669520938408. PubMed ID: 32782769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms.
Hibbard PB; Scott-Brown KC; Haigh EC; Adrain M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84087. PubMed ID: 24416195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interhemispherical comparisons in the processing of contour and random texture sinewave stereograms.
Shipley T; Garfinkel R; van Houten P
Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Nov; 58(3):269-305. PubMed ID: 6518980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
