197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29515502)
1. The Mental Representation of Polysemy across Word Classes.
Lopukhina A; Laurinavichyute A; Lopukhin K; Dragoy O
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():192. PubMed ID: 29515502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Representation of Different Types of Adjectival Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon.
Apresjan V; Lopukhina A; Zarifyan M
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():742064. PubMed ID: 34777131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metaphor Is Between Metonymy and Homonymy: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.
Yurchenko A; Lopukhina A; Dragoy O
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2113. PubMed ID: 32982863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.
Klepousniotou E; Titone D; Romero C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1534-43. PubMed ID: 18980412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
Hoffman P; Woollams AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
Li J; Joanisse MF
Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metonymy Processing in Chinese: A Linguistic Context-Sensitive Eye-Tracking Preliminary Study.
Chen X; Ren H; Yan X
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():916854. PubMed ID: 35967734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metaphors are physical and abstract: ERPs to metaphorically modified nouns resemble ERPs to abstract language.
Forgács B; Bardolph MD; Amsel BD; DeLong KA; Kutas M
Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():28. PubMed ID: 25713520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Action verbs are processed differently in metaphorical and literal sentences depending on the semantic match of visual primes.
Troyer M; Curley LB; Miller LE; Saygin AP; Bergen BK
Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():982. PubMed ID: 25538604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.
Pylkkänen L; Llinás R; Murphy GL
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 16417686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.
Jager B; Cleland AA
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is theology more of a field than a father is a king? Modelling semantic relatedness in processing literal and metaphorical statements.
Westbury C; Harati P
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1461-1471. PubMed ID: 35318579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon.
Klepousniotou E
Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):205-23. PubMed ID: 12081393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural representation of words within phrases: Temporal evolution of color-adjectives and object-nouns during simple composition.
Honari-Jahromi M; Chouinard B; Blanco-Elorrieta E; Pylkkänen L; Fyshe A
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0242754. PubMed ID: 33661954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speaker-Specific Cues Influence Semantic Disambiguation.
Davies C; Porretta V; Koleva K; Klepousniotou E
J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Oct; 51(5):933-955. PubMed ID: 35556197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Event-related potential evidence for the early activation of literal meaning during comprehension of conventional lexical metaphors.
Lu A; Zhang JX
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1730-8. PubMed ID: 22561889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.
Durkin K; Manning J
J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):577-612. PubMed ID: 2632800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do Patients With Depression Prefer Literal or Metaphorical Expressions for Internal States? Evidence From Sentence Completion and Elicited Production.
Kauschke C; Mueller N; Kircher T; Nagels A
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1326. PubMed ID: 30158885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
