65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29515820)
1. Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.
Vraga E; Myers T; Kotcher J; Beall L; Maibach E
R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):170505. PubMed ID: 29515820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Leveraging scientific credibility about Arctic sea ice trends in a polarized political environment.
Jamieson KH; Hardy BW
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13598-605. PubMed ID: 25225380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The 'credibility paradox' in China's science communication: Views from scientific practitioners.
Zhang JY
Public Underst Sci; 2015 Nov; 24(8):913-27. PubMed ID: 26307594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of Political Ideology on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults in the United States.
Bilalaga MM; Atarere J; Vasireddy R; Gaddipati GN; Mensah B; Kanth P
Dig Dis Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38831227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Figuring the 'cynical scientist' in British animal science: the politics of invisibility.
Holmes T; Friese C
Biosocieties; 2023; 18(4):780-800. PubMed ID: 38798880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beliefs about Childhood Vaccination in the United States: Political Ideology, False Consensus, and the Illusion of Uniqueness.
Rabinowitz M; Latella L; Stern C; Jost JT
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158382. PubMed ID: 27391965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of experts on attitude change in public-facing political science: Scientific communication on term limits in the United States.
Houck AM; King AS; Taylor JB
Public Underst Sci; 2024 Apr; ():9636625241246084. PubMed ID: 38659207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genesis or Evolution of Gender Differences? Worldview-Based Dilemmas in The Processing of Scientific Information.
Lewandowsky S; Woike JK; Oberauer K
J Cogn; 2020 Apr; 3(1):9. PubMed ID: 32377619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific realism, scientific practice, and science communication: An empirical investigation of academics and science communicators.
Pils R; Schoenegger P
Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Jun; 105():85-98. PubMed ID: 38754361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facing the challenges of science communication 2.0: quality, credibility and expertise.
Bucchi M
EFSA J; 2019 Jul; 17(Suppl 1):e170702. PubMed ID: 32626439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Follow the science': Popular trust in scientific experts during the coronavirus pandemic.
Seyd B; Hamm JA; Jennings W; McKay L; Valgarðsson V; Anness M
Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jun; ():9636625241253968. PubMed ID: 38863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public participation in human genome editing research governance: what do scientists think?
Waltz M; Flatt MA; Juengst ET; Conley JM; Cadigan RJ
J Community Genet; 2024 Jun; 15(3):249-257. PubMed ID: 38353891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Call them COVIDiots: Exploring the effects of aggressive communication style and psychological distance in the communication of COVID-19.
Chu H; Yuan S; Liu S
Public Underst Sci; 2021 Apr; 30(3):240-257. PubMed ID: 33517854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Talent goes to global cities: The world network of scientists' mobility.
Verginer L; Riccaboni M
Res Policy; 2021 Jan; 50(1):104127. PubMed ID: 32981979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of nonverbal communication when assessing witness credibility: a view from the bench.
Denault V; Leclerc C; Talwar V
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2024; 31(1):97-120. PubMed ID: 38455269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Divided we fall: Constructive dialoguing about our political differences within family therapy training.
Laszloffy TA; Platt JJ
J Marital Fam Ther; 2024 Jul; 50(3):523-544. PubMed ID: 38773715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the predictability of future impact in science.
Penner O; Pan RK; Petersen AM; Kaski K; Fortunato S
Sci Rep; 2013 Oct; 3():3052. PubMed ID: 24165898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
Hall D
Biophys Rev; 2023 Apr; 15(2):145-149. PubMed ID: 37124920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the scientific credibility of paleoanthropology: Reply to Villmoare and Kimbel.
Smith RJ; Wood B
Evol Anthropol; 2024 Jun; ():e22041. PubMed ID: 38944755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The controversial political plan of 'differentiation' of the regional autonomy].
Tognoni G
Assist Inferm Ric; 2024; 43(2):51-53. PubMed ID: 38873712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
