These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29517641)

  • 1. Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis.
    Arinc H
    Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29517641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Prosthetic Material and Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Arinc H
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Jun; 24():4279-4287. PubMed ID: 29930240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA.
    Ferreira MB; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Hipólito AC; Assunção WG
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():92-9. PubMed ID: 24411356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.
    Güçlü ZB; Gürbüz A; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R; Oyar P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Oct; 67(5):419-428. PubMed ID: 35972416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].
    Yu WQ; Li XQ; Chen SY; Ma XN; Xu X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 33557504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Bankoğlu Güngör M; Yılmaz H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 27063944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study.
    Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Kemmoku DT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Barão VA
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Dec; 69():715-25. PubMed ID: 27612765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Behavior of Tooth-Implant Supported Prostheses With Different Implant Connections: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis.
    de Paula GA; Silva GC; Vilaça ÊL; Cornacchia TM; de Magalhães CS; Moreira AN
    Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 29521677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.
    Meriç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; Ozden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
    Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress distribution of single-implant-retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: A finite element analysis study.
    Amaral CF; Gomes RS; Rodrigues Garcia RCM; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):791-796. PubMed ID: 28965674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible With Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Yu W; Chen S; Ma L; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 35546271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Faverani LP; Barão VA; Ramalho-Ferreira G; Delben JA; Ferreira MB; Garcia Júnior IR; Assunção WG
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Apr; 37():164-70. PubMed ID: 24582236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.