166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29518036)
1. An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets.
Di G; Lu K; Shi X
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 29518036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
Park HK; Bradley JS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relation between psychoacoustical factors and annoyance under different noise reduction conditions for railway noise.
Kasess CH; Maly T; Majdak P; Waubke H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3151. PubMed ID: 28599526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The annoyance of snoring and psychoacoustic parameters: a step towards an objective measurement.
Rohrmeier C; Herzog M; Haubner F; Kuehnel TS
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 269(5):1537-43. PubMed ID: 22167475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Annoyance and loudness measurements in auditory fatigue and recovery under different sound exposures].
Donner R; Doppler U; Haider M; Hloch T; Koller M
Soz Praventivmed; 1980 Jun; 25(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 7415564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise within the social context: annoyance reduction through fair procedures.
Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2000-10. PubMed ID: 17471717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influencing Factors Identification and Prediction of Noise Annoyance-A Case Study on Substation Noise.
Di G; Wang Y; Yao Y; Ma J; Wu J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Growth rate of loudness, annoyance, and noisiness as a function of tone location within the noise spectrum.
Hellman RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jan; 75(1):209-18. PubMed ID: 6699282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of the Psychoacoustic Effect of Noise from Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
Hui CTJ; Kingan MJ; Hioka Y; Schmid G; Dodd G; Dirks KN; Edlin S; Mascarenhas S; Shim YM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments.
Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Annoyance due to amplitude modulated low-frequency wind farm noise: A laboratory study.
Zajamsek B; Hansen K; Lechat B; Liebich T; Dunbar C; Micic G; Catcheside P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3410. PubMed ID: 36586880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity.
Ellermeier W; Eigenstetter M; Zimmer K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1464-73. PubMed ID: 11325118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discomfort estimation for aircraft cabin noise using linear regression and modified psychoacoustic annoyance approaches.
Huang Y; Lv B; Ni K; Jiang W
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):1963-1976. PubMed ID: 37782118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
