These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29518255)

  • 1. Quantification and decomposition of environment-selection relationships.
    Hunter DC; Pemberton JM; Pilkington JG; Morrissey MB
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):851-866. PubMed ID: 29518255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for Selection-by-Environment but Not Genotype-by-Environment Interactions for Fitness-Related Traits in a Wild Mammal Population.
    Hayward AD; Pemberton JM; Berenos C; Wilson AJ; Pilkington JG; Kruuk LEB
    Genetics; 2018 Jan; 208(1):349-364. PubMed ID: 29127262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-wide association mapping identifies the genetic basis of discrete and quantitative variation in sexual weaponry in a wild sheep population.
    Johnston SE; McEwan JC; Pickering NK; Kijas JW; Beraldi D; Pilkington JG; Pemberton JM; Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jun; 20(12):2555-66. PubMed ID: 21651634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prediction of adaptive evolution: empirical application of the secondary theorem of selection and comparison to the breeder's equation.
    Morrissey MB; Parker DJ; Korsten P; Pemberton JM; Kruuk LE; Wilson AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2399-410. PubMed ID: 22834740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cryptic selection forces and dynamic heritability in generalized phenotypic evolution.
    Gilpin W; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2019 Feb; 125():20-29. PubMed ID: 30528351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bigger Is Fitter? Quantitative Genetic Decomposition of Selection Reveals an Adaptive Evolutionary Decline of Body Mass in a Wild Rodent Population.
    Bonnet T; Wandeler P; Camenisch G; Postma E
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):e1002592. PubMed ID: 28125583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution in fluctuating environments: decomposing selection into additive components of the Robertson-Price equation.
    Engen S; Saether BE
    Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):854-65. PubMed ID: 24299465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissecting the dynamics of epigenetic changes in phenotype-structured populations exposed to fluctuating environments.
    Lorenzi T; Chisholm RH; Desvillettes L; Hughes BD
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():166-76. PubMed ID: 26375370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection on mothers and offspring: whose phenotype is it and does it matter?
    Wilson AJ; Pilkington JG; Pemberton JM; Coltman DW; Overall AD; Byrne KA; Kruuk LE
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 15807429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The temporal distribution of directional gradients under selection for an optimum.
    Chevin LM; Haller BC
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3381-94. PubMed ID: 25302419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantitative genetic model of r- and K-selection in a fluctuating population.
    Engen S; Lande R; Saether BE
    Am Nat; 2013 Jun; 181(6):725-36. PubMed ID: 23669536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evolutionary framework outlining the integration of individual social and spatial ecology.
    Webber QMR; Vander Wal E
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):113-127. PubMed ID: 29055050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fitness consequences of maternal and embryonic responses to environmental variation: using reptiles as models for studies of developmental plasticity.
    Warner DA
    Integr Comp Biol; 2014 Nov; 54(5):757-73. PubMed ID: 25016385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolution of phenotype-environment associations by genetic responses to selection and phenotypic plasticity in a temporally autocorrelated environment.
    Michel MJ; Chevin LM; Knouft JH
    Evolution; 2014 May; 68(5):1374-84. PubMed ID: 24475940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental heterogeneity generates fluctuating selection on a secondary sexual trait.
    Robinson MR; Pilkington JG; Clutton-Brock TH; Pemberton JM; Kruuk LEB
    Curr Biol; 2008 May; 18(10):751-757. PubMed ID: 18485708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The concept of fitness in fluctuating environments.
    Sæther BE; Engen S
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 May; 30(5):273-81. PubMed ID: 25843273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heritable environmental variance causes nonlinear relationships between traits: application to birth weight and stillbirth of pigs.
    Mulder HA; Hill WG; Knol EF
    Genetics; 2015 Apr; 199(4):1255-69. PubMed ID: 25631318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does environmental robustness play a role in fluctuating environments?
    Ketola T; Kellermann VM; Loeschcke V; López-Sepulcre A; Kristensen TN
    Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):587-94. PubMed ID: 24168320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian inference of selection in a heterogeneous environment from genetic time-series data.
    Gompert Z
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 26184577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection.
    Lande R
    Evolution; 2007 Aug; 61(8):1835-46. PubMed ID: 17683427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.