590 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29519280)
1. [Variability of peripheral arterial peak velocity predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Lu N; Jiang L; Zhu B; Han W; Zhao Y; Shi Y; Guo F; Xi X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Mar; 30(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 29519280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.
Lu N; Xi X; Jiang L; Yang D; Yin K
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1258-1261. PubMed ID: 28363617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Measurement of brachial artery velocity variation and inferior vena cava variability to estimate fluid responsiveness].
Zhu W; Wan L; Wan X; Wang G; Su M; Liao G; Huang Q
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2016 Aug; 28(8):713-7. PubMed ID: 27434562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cephalic artery peak velocity variation during passive leg raising can predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated severe sepsis patients with spontaneous breathing].
Xue YM; Zeng LJ; Chen DW; Lai BC; Xu BF; He JY; Wu W; Lin FH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 98(31):2476-2480. PubMed ID: 30138998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mean arterial pressure as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Qi H; Gu Q; Liu N; Zhang BY
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2013 Jan; 25(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 23611094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Passive leg raising combined with echocardiography could evaluate volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Hu X; Li L; Hao X; Niu N; Tang Y
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 May; 31(5):619-622. PubMed ID: 31198151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure to assess the value of passive leg-raising test in predicting volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
Liu Y; Tang W; Xiao D
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2022 Feb; 34(2):133-137. PubMed ID: 35387717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The value of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure combined passive leg raising test on volume responsiveness assessment in shocked patients post cardiac operation].
Yao T; Wu W; Zheng X; Fang Q
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2016 Mar; 28(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 29919998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Early predictive value of hemodynamic parameters during fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis shock].
Chen W; Zang X; Niu S; Lyu C; Zhao L; Sheng B; Gu X; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 25591436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of esmolol on fluid responsiveness and hemodynamic parameters in patients with septic shock].
Tao Y; Jingyi W; Xiaogan J; Weihua L; Xiaoju J
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Nov; 27(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 27132454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The value of passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction].
Xiang S; Muyun H; Juan C; Bin O; Minying C; Changjie C; Jianfeng W; Zimeng L; Yongjun L; Shunwei H; Lifen L; Xiangdong G
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Sep; 27(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 26955698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis].
Yu YH; Dai HW; Yan ML; Gong SJ; Cai GL; Zhang ZC; Chen J; Yan J
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 21(8):463-5. PubMed ID: 19695166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of carotid corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity with stroke volume variation in elderly patients under general anaesthesia.
Chen Y; Liu Z; Fang J; Xie Y; Zhang M; Yang J
BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):246. PubMed ID: 35927621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Stroke volume variation in the evaluation of fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock].
Zhang HM; Liu DW; Wang XT; Rui X; Wang H; He HW; Liu Y; Chen XK
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 49(7):610-3. PubMed ID: 20979775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study.
Ibarra-Estrada MÁ; López-Pulgarín JA; Mijangos-Méndez JC; Díaz-Gómez JL; Aguirre-Avalos G
Crit Ultrasound J; 2015 Dec; 7(1):29. PubMed ID: 26123610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The effect of anticoagulant therapy on coagulation and inflammation markers in sepsis patients and its significance].
Han Y; Gao C; Qin B; Xu H; Song X; Li B; Peng B; Fan T; Cheng Z
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Feb; 27(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 25665607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The assessment of ultrasonic measurement of superior vena cava blood flow for the volume responsiveness of patients with mechanical ventilation].
Guo Z; He W; Hou J; Li T; Zhou H; Xu Y; Xi X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2014 Sep; 26(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 25230862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
