These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29520711)

  • 21. Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.
    Mozolic JL; Joyner D; Hugenschmidt CE; Peiffer AM; Kraft RA; Maldjian JA; Laurienti PJ
    BMC Neurol; 2008 Sep; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18817554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Alpha Frequency Entrainment Reduces the Effect of Visual Distractors.
    Wiesman AI; Wilson TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 31(9):1392-1403. PubMed ID: 31059352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Timing is everything: changes in presentation rate have opposite effects on auditory and visual implicit statistical learning.
    Emberson LL; Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1021-40. PubMed ID: 21347988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Natural rhythms of periodic temporal attention.
    Zalta A; Petkoski S; Morillon B
    Nat Commun; 2020 Feb; 11(1):1051. PubMed ID: 32103014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional rhythm: a temporal analogue of object-based attention.
    De Freitas J; Liverence BM; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 23586668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Practice makes perfect: High performance gains in older adults engaged in selective attention within and across sensory modalities.
    Rienäcker F; Jacobs HIL; Van Heugten CM; Van Gerven PWM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():101-111. PubMed ID: 30240890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Musical rhythm effects on visual attention are non-rhythmical: evidence against metrical entrainment.
    Schirmer A; Wijaya M; Chiu MH; Maess B; Gunter TC
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 16(1-2):58-71. PubMed ID: 32507877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevailing theories of consciousness are challenged by novel cross-modal associations acquired between subliminal stimuli.
    Scott RB; Samaha J; Chrisley R; Dienes Z
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():169-185. PubMed ID: 29544152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multi-modal distraction: insights from children's limited attention.
    Matusz PJ; Broadbent H; Ferrari J; Forrest B; Merkley R; Scerif G
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():156-65. PubMed ID: 25497524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interregional alpha-band synchrony supports temporal cross-modal integration.
    van Driel J; Knapen T; van Es DM; Cohen MX
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():404-15. PubMed ID: 25042447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.
    Haroush K; Hochstein S; Deouell LY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19580389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Got rhythm…for better and for worse. Cross-modal effects of auditory rhythm on visual word recognition.
    Brochard R; Tassin M; Zagar D
    Cognition; 2013 May; 127(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.