174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29521152)
1. Are competing risks models appropriate to describe implant failure?
Sayers A; Evans JT; Whitehouse MR; Blom AW
Acta Orthop; 2018 Jun; 89(3):256-258. PubMed ID: 29521152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Overestimates the Risk of Revision Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.
Lacny S; Wilson T; Clement F; Roberts DJ; Faris PD; Ghali WA; Marshall DA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3431-42. PubMed ID: 25804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competing Risk of Death When Comparing Tibial Implant Types in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Maradit Kremers H; Kremers WK; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 27053588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the sample size required to establish whether a medical device is non-inferior to an external benchmark.
Sayers A; Crowther MJ; Judge A; Whitehouse MR; Blom AW
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e015397. PubMed ID: 28851772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
Kuijpers MFL; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31928096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating implant survival in the presence of competing risks.
Biau DJ; Hamadouche M
Int Orthop; 2011 Feb; 35(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 20652695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary constrained and hinged total knee arthroplasty: 2- and 5-year revision risk compared with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty: a report on 401 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2017.
Badawy M; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 31210080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Competing events influence estimated survival probability: when is Kaplan-Meier analysis appropriate?
Biau DJ; Latouche A; Porcher R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 462():229-33. PubMed ID: 17496556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Competing risks survival analysis applied to data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Gillam MH; Ryan P; Graves SE; Miller LN; de Steiger RN; Salter A
Acta Orthop; 2010 Oct; 81(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 20919809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is Kaplan-Meier statistics the most appropriate tool for survivorship measurement of outcomes in orthopaedics?].
Langová K; Gallo J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 20447354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips.
Canadian Arthroplasty Society
Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 23908418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acetabular complications are the most common cause for revision surgery following proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement : what is the best bearing option in the primary and revision setting?
Lex JR; Evans S; Parry MC; Jeys L; Stevenson JD
Bone Joint J; 2021 Oct; 103-B(10):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 34587800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the Cox model to the Fine-Gray model for survival analyses of re-fracture rates.
Nolan EK; Chen HY
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):86. PubMed ID: 32519193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overestimation of the risk of revision with Kaplan-Meier presenting the long-term outcome of total hip replacement in older patients.
Lampropoulou-Adamidou K; Karachalios TS; Hartofilakidis G
Hip Int; 2018 May; 28(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 29192728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach.
Beuscart JB; Pagniez D; Boulanger E; Lessore de Sainte Foy C; Salleron J; Frimat L; Duhamel A
BMC Nephrol; 2012 May; 13():31. PubMed ID: 22646159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient survival following joint replacement due to metastatic bone disease - comparison of overall patient and prostheses survival between cohorts treated in two different time-periods.
Hovgaard TB; Horstmann PF; Petersen MM; Sørensen MS
Acta Oncol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):839-848. PubMed ID: 29293034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision total knee arthroplasty in the young patient: is there trouble on the horizon?
Aggarwal VK; Goyal N; Deirmengian G; Rangavajulla A; Parvizi J; Austin MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):536-42. PubMed ID: 24695919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals.
van Walraven C; McAlister FA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():170-3.e8. PubMed ID: 26232083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
