167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2952151)
1. Adverse reactions following two separate intravascular injections of contrast media in the same patient. A comparison between iohexol and monomeric ionic media.
Sogn EE; Odegård T; Haider T; Andrew E
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 2952151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intravascular studies with iohexol (Omnipaque). Results from the first 49 clinical trials.
Andrew E; Dahlstrøm K; Sveen K; Hvinden G; Holager T; Mowinckel P; Renaa T; Laulund S
Eur J Radiol; 1985 Feb; 5(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 3891345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Summary of U.S. and European intravascular experience with iohexol based on the clinical trial program.
Dahlstrom K; Shaw DD; Clauss W; Andrew E; Sveen K
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S117-21. PubMed ID: 3882613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence of acute reactions to iopromide: postmarketing surveillance study of 74,717 patients.
Kopp AF; Mortele KJ; Cho YD; Palkowitsch P; Bettmann MA; Claussen CD
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):902-11. PubMed ID: 18651252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Late adverse reactions of non-ionic intravenous contrast media].
Nambu T; Yoshikawa H; Shirato H; Suzuki K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Aug; 50(8):1019-21. PubMed ID: 2235336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of roentgen contrast medium reactions after intravenous injection in pre-registration trials and post-marketing surveillances.
Andrew E; Haider T
Acta Radiol; 1993 May; 34(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 8489831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immunologic basis for adverse reactions to radiographic contrast media.
Stejskal V; Nilsson R; Grepe A
Acta Radiol; 1990 Nov; 31(6):605-12. PubMed ID: 2278787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency of late allergy-like adverse reactions following injection of intravascular non-ionic contrast media. A retrospective study comparing a non-ionic monomeric contrast medium with a non-ionic dimeric contrast medium.
Rydberg J; Charles J; Aspelin P
Acta Radiol; 1998 May; 39(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 9571932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lumbar myelography with iohexol. Adverse effects compared with spinal puncture.
Nestvold K; Sortland O
Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(6):637-40. PubMed ID: 3190941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phase II studies in urography, cardioangiography and cerebral angiography with iohexol. An evaluation of the clinical trial program and the clinical findings.
Andrew E; Sveen K; Renaa T; Dahlstrøm K
Eur J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 3(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 6628397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravenous contrast media in uroradiology: evaluation of safety and tolerability in almost 50,000 patients.
Wendt-Nordahl G; Rotert H; Trojan L; Michel MS; Peters CR; Alken P; Knoll T
Med Princ Pract; 2006; 15(5):358-61. PubMed ID: 16888393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A rare case of disseminated intravascular coagulation caused by the nonionic contrast medium iohexol.
Shigyo M; Tsukamoto T; Yanase M; Kumamoto Y; Aoki M; Katsumata K
J Urol; 1995 Jun; 153(6):1901-3. PubMed ID: 7752347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide].
Schmiedel E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iohexol: summary of North American and European clinical trials in adult lumbar, thoracic, and cervical myelography with a new nonionic contrast medium.
Shaw DD; Bach-Gansmo T; Dahlstrom K
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S44-50. PubMed ID: 3882616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of adverse reactions to iodine-containing contrast media after ERCP.
Draganov PV; Forsmark CE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Dec; 68(6):1098-101. PubMed ID: 19028218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.
Yamaguchi K; Takanashi I; Kanauchi T; Hoshi T; Kubota H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 52(11):1565-70. PubMed ID: 1465338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A study of iopamidol (Iopamiron 370) in intravenous urography in the patients with previous adverse reactions to contrast media and history of allergy].
Kondo K; Kamidono S; Hamami G
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Oct; 34(10):1845-51. PubMed ID: 3245531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
