BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29521751)

  • 21. Custom implant design for patients with cranial defects.
    Lee MY; Chang CC; Lin CC; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(2):38-44. PubMed ID: 12012603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Generation of customized orbital implant templates using 3-dimensional printing for orbital wall reconstruction.
    Kang S; Kwon J; Ahn CJ; Esmaeli B; Kim GB; Kim N; Sa HS
    Eye (Lond); 2018 Dec; 32(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 30154573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Technical concept of patient-specific, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene orbital wall implant.
    Kozakiewicz M; Elgalal M; Walkowiak B; Stefanczyk L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23333489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chest-wall reconstruction with a customized titanium-alloy prosthesis fabricated by 3D printing and rapid prototyping.
    Wen X; Gao S; Feng J; Li S; Gao R; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 13(1):4. PubMed ID: 29310677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.
    Anchieta MV; Salles FA; Cassaro BD; Quaresma MM; Santos BF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1919-25. PubMed ID: 27167515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Customized Technique of Cranioplasty for Patients with Large Skull Defects: A Technical Note.
    Metwali H; Hassanin M; Ibrahim T
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():110-114. PubMed ID: 33422719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preformed titanium cranioplasty after resection of skull base meningiomas - a technical note.
    Schebesch KM; Höhne J; Gassner HG; Brawanski A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):803-7. PubMed ID: 23434238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patient-Specific Implants: Description of a New Three-Dimension Technique.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Idema S; Te Slaa S; Verver F; Wolff J; Forouzanfar T; Peerdeman S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):408-411. PubMed ID: 30676441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates.
    Dean D; Min KJ; Bond A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):819-32. PubMed ID: 14600623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction.
    Peltola MJ; Vallittu PK; Vuorinen V; Aho AA; Puntala A; Aitasalo KM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 269(2):623-8. PubMed ID: 21630063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
    Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reverse engineering techniques for cranioplasty: a case study.
    Maravelakis E; David K; Antoniadis A; Manios A; Bilalis N; Papaharilaou Y
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17852651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Custom-made 3D printing-based cranioplasty using a silicone mould and PMMA.
    Csámer L; Csernátony Z; Novák L; Kővári VZ; Kovács ÁÉ; Soósné Horváth H; Manó S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11985. PubMed ID: 37491550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
    Metzger MC; Hohlweg-Majert B; Schön R; Teschner M; Gellrich NC; Schmelzeisen R; Gutwald R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e1-10. PubMed ID: 17656126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Feasibility of Customised Polymethyl Methacrylate Implants Fabricated Using 3D Printed Flexible Moulds for Correction of Facial Skeletal Deformities.
    Jain R; Mahendru S; Aggarwal A; Brajesh V; Aulakh HS; Singh S; Jain A; Khazanchi RK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):1981-1985. PubMed ID: 33645954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low-Cost, Three-Dimensionally-Printed, Anatomical Models for Optimization of Orbital Wall Reconstruction.
    Dvoracek LA; Lee JY; Unadkat JV; Lee YH; Thakrar D; Losee JE; Goldstein JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 147(1):162-166. PubMed ID: 33370061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rapid prototyped patient specific implants for reconstruction of orbital wall defects.
    Stoor P; Suomalainen A; Lindqvist C; Mesimäki K; Danielsson D; Westermark A; Kontio RK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1644-9. PubMed ID: 25139812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty.
    Lara WC; Schweitzer J; Lewis RP; Odum BC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 10177458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel economically viable solution for 3D printing-assisted cranioplast fabrication.
    Lal B; Ghosh M; Agarwal B; Gupta D; Roychoudhury A
    Br J Neurosurg; 2020 Jun; 34(3):280-283. PubMed ID: 32075447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Skull Bone Defects Reconstruction with Custom-Made Titanium Graft shaped with Electron Beam Melting Technology: Preliminary Experience in a Series of Ten Patients.
    Francaviglia N; Maugeri R; Odierna Contino A; Meli F; Fiorenza V; Costantino G; Giammalva RG; Iacopino DG
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2017; 124():137-141. PubMed ID: 28120065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.