These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29522269)

  • 21. Development of a digital impression procedure using photogrammetry for complete denture fabrication.
    Matsuda T; Goto T; Kurahashi K; Kashiwabara T; Ichikawa T
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 27644177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A dental technique.
    Iturrate M; Minguez R; Pradies G; Solaberrieta E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):237-241. PubMed ID: 30093123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.
    Pesce P; Pera F; Setti P; Menini M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 29518813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Functional impression and jaw registration: a single session procedure for the construction of complete dentures.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Kettner N; Reppert G; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):554-61. PubMed ID: 15189312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - An in vivo feasibility study.
    Hack G; Liberman L; Vach K; Tchorz JP; Kohal RJ; Patzelt SBM
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):444-453. PubMed ID: 32061572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.
    Edher F; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29961618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative clinical study on the transfer accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions using a new reference key-based method.
    Schmidt A; Rein PE; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Apr; 32(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33469983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital immediate denture: A clinical report.
    Fang JH; An X; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):698-701. PubMed ID: 28927924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery.
    Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital intraoral scanning technique for edentulous jaws.
    Fang JH; An X; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):733-735. PubMed ID: 28888413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of interim fixed reference points to maintain the occlusal vertical dimension: a technique for immediate loading protocols in the edentulous mandible.
    Holst S; Blatz MB; Bergler M; Wichmann M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 16911891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data.
    Goodacre CJ; Garbacea A; Naylor WP; Daher T; Marchack CB; Lowry J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 22230914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Feasibility and Accuracy of Digitizing Edentulous Maxillectomy Defects: A Comparative Study.
    Elbashti ME; Hattori M; Patzelt SB; Schulze D; Sumita YI; Taniguchi H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 28267823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Single-arch digital removable complete denture: A workflow that starts from the intraoral scan.
    Lo Russo L; Salamini A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 29195814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A prosthesis fabrication technique for the edentulous maxillary resection patient.
    Shifman A; Kusner W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Nov; 56(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 3534229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An accurate method for occlusal registration and altered-cast impression for removable partial dentures during the same visit as the framework try-in.
    Santana-Penín U; Lozano JG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 9813814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Obtaining maxillomandibular records and definitive impressions in a single visit for a completely edentulous patient with a history of combination syndrome.
    Daher T; Dermendjian S; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):489-91. PubMed ID: 18514672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.