195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29523989)
21. Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal.
Wada Y; Miyoshi N; Ohue M; Noura S; Fujino S; Sugimura K; Akita H; Motoori M; Gotoh K; Takahashi H; Kobayashi S; Ohmori T; Fujiwara Y; Yano M
Mol Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 3(3):619-622. PubMed ID: 26137277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture.
Dusch N; Goranova D; Herrle F; Niedergethmann M; Kienle P
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1033-40. PubMed ID: 23634717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of skin closure technique on surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal: retrospective cohort study.
Klink CD; Wünschmann M; Binnebösel M; Alizai HP; Lambertz A; Boehm G; Neumann UP; Krones CJ
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(10):1123-5. PubMed ID: 24035923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Synthetic mesh versus biological mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized feasibility trial.
Mäkäräinen EJ; Wiik HT; Kössi JA; Pinta TM; Mäntymäki LJ; Mattila AK; Kairaluoma MV; Ohtonen PP; Rautio TT
BMC Surg; 2023 Mar; 23(1):68. PubMed ID: 36973782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.
O'Leary DP; Carter M; Wijewardene D; Burton M; Waldron D; Condon E; Coffey JC; Peirce C
Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Nov; 21(11):863-868. PubMed ID: 29149428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Incisional hernia at the site of stoma reversal-incidence and risk factors in a retrospective observational analysis.
Lorenz A; Kogler P; Kafka-Ritsch R; Öfner D; Perathoner A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1179-1187. PubMed ID: 31065787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Risk factors for surgical site infections and trends in skin closure technique after diverting loop ileostomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.
Mirande MD; McKenna NP; Bews KA; Shawki SF; Cima RR; Brady JT; Colibaseanu DT; Mathis KL; Kelley SR
Am J Surg; 2023 Nov; 226(5):703-708. PubMed ID: 37567817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcome of purse-string versus linear skin closure after ileostomy stoma reversal in terms of stoma sites infection and cosmesis.
Ali D; Zubair M; Kaiser MA; Khokhar I; Afzal MF
J Pak Med Assoc; 2021 Feb; 71(2(A)):414-416. PubMed ID: 33819218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing Surgical Site Infection and Scar Cosmesis Between Conventional Linear Skin Closure Versus Purse-string Skin Closure in Stoma Reversal - A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Sureshkumar S; Jubel K; Ali MS; Vijayakumar C; Amaranathan A; Sundaramoorthy S; Palanivel C
Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2181. PubMed ID: 29657907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh in loop-ileostomy reversal: a case-control study.
Pizza F; D'Antonio D; Arcopinto M; Dell'Isola C; Marvaso A
Updates Surg; 2020 Mar; 72(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 31919832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia after temporary loop ileostomy closure: choosing candidates for prophylactic mesh placement.
Barranquero AG; Tobaruela E; Bajawi M; Muñoz P; Die Trill J; Garcia-Perez JC
Hernia; 2020 Feb; 24(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 31494806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repair of Parastomal Hernia with Component Separation at Reversal of Loop Ileostomy. A technical note.
Lee H; Angelos G; Gachabayov M; Kajmolli A; Bergamaschi R
Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():143-147. PubMed ID: 31476794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prevention of incisional hernia with retrorectus synthetic mesh versus biological mesh following loop ileostomy closure (Preloop trial).
Mäkäräinen EJ; Wiik HT; Kössi JAO; Pinta TM; Mäntymäki LJ; Mattila AK; Nikki MJ; Järvinen JE; Ohtonen PP; Rautio TT
Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(1):. PubMed ID: 37944025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Umbilical Defunctioning Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer Results in Reduced Risk for Incisional Hernia.
Eto K; Kosuge M; Ohkuma M; Ito D; Takeda Y; Yatabe S; Sugano H; Takada N; Kumamoto T; Yanaga K
Anticancer Res; 2020 Jun; 40(6):3445-3451. PubMed ID: 32487643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preloop trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck E; Wiik H; Kössi J; Ohtonen P; Rautio T
Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):617. PubMed ID: 30413211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds.
Reid K; Pockney P; Pollitt T; Draganic B; Smith SR
Br J Surg; 2010 Oct; 97(10):1511-7. PubMed ID: 20575111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bioprosthetic mesh reinforcement during temporary stoma closure decreases the rate of incisional hernia: A blinded, case-matched study in 94 patients with rectal cancer.
Maggiori L; Moszkowicz D; Zappa M; Mongin C; Panis Y
Surgery; 2015 Dec; 158(6):1651-7. PubMed ID: 26260286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
McCartan DP; Burke JP; Walsh SR; Coffey JC
Tech Coloproctol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 23354904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A beneficial effect of purse-string skin closure after ileostomy takedown: a retrospective cohort study.
Suh YJ; Park JW; Kim YS; Park SC; Oh JH
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 24810869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stoma-site hernia after stoma reversal following rectal cancer resection.
Mongelard K; Mynster T; Jensen KK
Dan Med J; 2020 Mar; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 32138828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
