These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29524250)

  • 1. Improved protein model quality assessments by changing the target function.
    Uziela K; Menéndez Hurtado D; Shu N; Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2018 Jun; 86(6):654-663. PubMed ID: 29524250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP13: Challenges in the era of deep learning.
    Won J; Baek M; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Seok C
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1351-1360. PubMed ID: 31436360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.
    Benkert P; Schwede T; Tosatto SC
    BMC Struct Biol; 2009 May; 9():35. PubMed ID: 19457232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Larsson P; Skwark MJ; Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():167-72. PubMed ID: 19544566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.
    Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):345-360. PubMed ID: 28833563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein contact prediction by integrating deep multiple sequence alignments, coevolution and machine learning.
    Adhikari B; Hou J; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):84-96. PubMed ID: 29047157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein model accuracy estimation empowered by deep learning and inter-residue distance prediction in CASP14.
    Chen X; Liu J; Guo Z; Wu T; Hou J; Cheng J
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10943. PubMed ID: 34035363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of template-based modeling of protein structure in CASP11.
    Modi V; Xu Q; Adhikari S; Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):200-20. PubMed ID: 27081927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ProQ3D: improved model quality assessments using deep learning.
    Uziela K; Menéndez Hurtado D; Shu N; Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(10):1578-1580. PubMed ID: 28052925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2.
    Ray A; Lindahl E; Wallner B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():224. PubMed ID: 22963006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assessment of modeled protein structure using physicochemical properties.
    Rana PS; Sharma H; Bhattacharya M; Shukla A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Apr; 13(2):1550005. PubMed ID: 25524475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11.
    Kryshtafovych A; Barbato A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):349-69. PubMed ID: 26344049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():184-93. PubMed ID: 17894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact-assisted protein structure modeling by global optimization in CASP11.
    Joo K; Joung I; Cheng Q; Lee SJ; Lee J
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1():189-99. PubMed ID: 26677100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DeepQA: improving the estimation of single protein model quality with deep belief networks.
    Cao R; Bhattacharya D; Hou J; Cheng J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):495. PubMed ID: 27919220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MetaMQAP: a meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models.
    Pawlowski M; Gajda MJ; Matlak R; Bujnicki JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():403. PubMed ID: 18823532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for estimation of model accuracy in CASP12.
    Elofsson A; Joo K; Keasar C; Lee J; Maghrabi AHA; Manavalan B; McGuffin LJ; Ménendez Hurtado D; Mirabello C; Pilstål R; Sidi T; Uziela K; Wallner B
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():361-373. PubMed ID: 28975666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating local protein model quality: prospects for molecular replacement.
    Wallner B
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2020 Mar; 76(Pt 3):285-290. PubMed ID: 32133992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models.
    Olechnovič K; Kulberkytė E; Venclovas C
    Proteins; 2013 Jan; 81(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 22933340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.