144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29524359)
1. Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control.
Hitch GJ; Hu Y; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 29524359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: evidence from suffix and strategy effects.
Hu Y; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD; Zhang M; Allen RJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1665-1678. PubMed ID: 24933616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The limits of visual working memory in children: Exploring prioritization and recency effects with sequential presentation.
Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
Dev Psychol; 2018 Feb; 54(2):240-253. PubMed ID: 29154649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory.
Hu Y; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2164-75. PubMed ID: 27142524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
Koshino H
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
Barth A; Schneider D
Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?
Atkinson AL; Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):115-126. PubMed ID: 29635690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
Frenken M; Berti S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference.
Allen RJ; Ueno T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1731-1743. PubMed ID: 29968084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.
Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():225-238. PubMed ID: 31629945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Behavioral decoding of working memory items inside and outside the focus of attention.
Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):256-267. PubMed ID: 29604084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attending to behaviorally relevant moments enhances incidental relational memory.
Turker HB; Swallow KM
Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30097907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: evidence for a common executive attention construct.
McCabe DP; Roediger HL; McDaniel MA; Balota DA; Hambrick DZ
Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):222-243. PubMed ID: 20230116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time-sharing in the continuous distractor paradigm: a reexamination of the long-term recency effect.
Sato K
Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1107-20. PubMed ID: 8337055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
