These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29524359)

  • 21. Visual working memory capacity increases between ages 3 and 8 years, controlling for gains in attention, perception, and executive control.
    Pailian H; Libertus ME; Feigenson L; Halberda J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1556-73. PubMed ID: 27225467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Working Memory Replay Prioritizes Weakly Attended Events.
    Jafarpour A; Penny W; Barnes G; Knight RT; Duzel E
    eNeuro; 2017; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 28824955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
    Han SW
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):748-759. PubMed ID: 22774858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual working memory phenomena based on categorical tasks replicate using a continuous measure: A simple interpretation and some methodological considerations.
    Hu Y; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 36754918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can valuable information be prioritized in verbal working memory?
    Atkinson AL; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Waterman AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 May; 47(5):747-764. PubMed ID: 33136420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Backward inhibition in a task of switching attention within verbal working memory.
    Bao M; Li ZH; Chen XC; Zhang DR
    Brain Res Bull; 2006 Mar; 69(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 16533672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Task disruption makes visual working memory temporarily vulnerable to test interference.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J; Olivers CNL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):722-733. PubMed ID: 29094991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Happiness increases verbal and spatial working memory capacity where sadness does not: Emotion, working memory and executive control.
    Storbeck J; Maswood R
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Aug; 30(5):925-38. PubMed ID: 25947579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity.
    Morey CC; Elliott EM; Wiggers J; Eaves SD; Shelton JT; Mall JT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 22749714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 29346019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of recoding and presentation format on recency and suffix effects.
    Manning SK; Koehler L; Hampton S
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Mar; 18(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 2319958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.
    Tsuchida Y; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22484011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Working memory-driven attention improves spatial resolution: Support for perceptual enhancement.
    Pan Y; Luo Q; Cheng M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1625-32. PubMed ID: 27192995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visuospatial bootstrapping: Binding useful visuospatial information during verbal working memory encoding does not require set-shifting executive resources.
    Calia C; Darling S; Havelka J; Allen RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):913-921. PubMed ID: 29649944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Working memory, attention, and executive function in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.
    Stopford CL; Thompson JC; Neary D; Richardson AM; Snowden JS
    Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):429-46. PubMed ID: 21237452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.