These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29524957)

  • 1. Toward Customized Care Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Minvielle E
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Mar; 7(3):272-274. PubMed ID: 29524957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Greenfield D; Eljiz K; Butler-Henderson K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Feb; 7(2):183-185. PubMed ID: 29524942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Best of Both Worlds Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Needham C
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):356-358. PubMed ID: 29626405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. (Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.
    Mannion R; Exworthy M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Jun; 6(6):301-304. PubMed ID: 28812821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Ansmann L; Pfaff H
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):349-352. PubMed ID: 29626403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competing Logics and Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Saks M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):359-361. PubMed ID: 29626406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare? Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Ferlie E
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Jan; 7(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 29325410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Managing customization in health care: a framework derived from the services sector literature.
    Minvielle E; Waelli M; Sicotte C; Kimberly JR
    Health Policy; 2014 Aug; 117(2):216-27. PubMed ID: 24837516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current developments in delivering customized care: a scoping review.
    Minvielle E; Fourcade A; Ricketts T; Waelli M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):575. PubMed ID: 34120603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value configurations for balancing standardization and customization in chronic care: a qualitative study.
    Colldén C; Hellström A; Gremyr I
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Aug; 21(1):845. PubMed ID: 34416902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Creating value-focused healthcare delivery systems: Part three--Core competencies.
    Beveridge RN
    J Oncol Manag; 1997; 6(6):16-23. PubMed ID: 10174597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance.
    Sinsky CA; Bavafa H; Roberts RG; Beasley JW
    Ann Fam Med; 2021; 19(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 33685879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orchestration versus bookkeeping: How stakeholder pressures drive a healthcare purchaser's institutional logics.
    Noort BAC; van der Vaart T; Ahaus K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258337. PubMed ID: 34644324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.
    Arai H; Ouchi Y; Toba K; Endo T; Shimokado K; Tsubota K; Matsuo S; Mori H; Yumura W; Yokode M; Rakugi H; Ohshima S
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2015 Jun; 15(6):673-87. PubMed ID: 25656311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating factors affecting patient satisfaction using the Kano model.
    Materla T; Cudney EA; Hopen D
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2019 Feb; 32(1):137-151. PubMed ID: 30859869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Busolo D; Woodgate R
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 26447011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Convenient care clinics: opposition, opportunity, and the path to health system integration.
    Lin DQ
    Front Health Serv Manage; 2008; 24(3):3-11. PubMed ID: 18435355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuity through best practice: design and implementation of a nurse-led community leg-ulcer service.
    Lorimer K
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Jun; 36(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15369168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.