These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29524988)

  • 1. Journal editors as curators of scholarship: A case study in repairing the scientific record.
    Franco EL; Shinder GA; Tota JE; Volesky K; Isidean SD
    Prev Med; 2018 May; 110():114-115. PubMed ID: 29524988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.
    Kleinert S; Wager E
    Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):35-41. PubMed ID: 25711220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1987 Dec; 258(23):3424-7. PubMed ID: 3682141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
    Muir-Cochrane E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Gorin SV; Koroleva AM; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1351-4. PubMed ID: 27510376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
    Misra DP; Ravindran V; Agarwal V
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 33(46):e287. PubMed ID: 30416407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
    Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are Private Interests Clouding the Peer-Review Process of the WHO Bulletin? A Case Study.
    Homedes N; Ugalde A
    Account Res; 2016; 23(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 27028494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.
    Resnik DB; Elmore SA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):169-88. PubMed ID: 25633924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editors and auditors.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studying journal editors: the worst heresy.
    Epstein WM
    IRB; 1989; 11(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
    Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
    Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medwave’s editorial history, policies and guidelines: 3. Section policies.
    Bachelet VC
    Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6910. PubMed ID: 28430764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
    Wager E; Williams P
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 21486985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical editors to take tougher line.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):11. PubMed ID: 15139349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewing editorial peer review: a further step towards developing common editorial standards.
    Ponsi M
    Int J Psychoanal; 2003 Apr; 84(Pt 2):443-5. PubMed ID: 12856361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing publication bias in biomedical research: reviewing and registering protocol with a suitable journal.
    Rezaeian M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():248-9. PubMed ID: 26051243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.