These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29525321)

  • 1. Midwives and clinical investigation: A review of the literature.
    Alexander CR; Bogossian F
    Women Birth; 2018 Dec; 31(6):442-452. PubMed ID: 29525321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An exploration of the effects of clinical negligence litigation on the practice of midwives in England: A phenomenological study.
    Robertson JH; Thomson AM
    Midwifery; 2016 Feb; 33():55-63. PubMed ID: 26527326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Australian midwives and clinical investigation: Exploration of the personal and professional impact.
    Alexander C; Bogossian F; New K
    Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 32948468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Closed Claims Analysis of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Midwives: Lessons Learned Regarding Safe Practices and the Avoidance of Litigation.
    McCool WF; Guidera M; Griffinger E; Sacan D
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 26255804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-ethnographic synthesis of midwives' and nurses' experiences of adverse labour and birth events.
    Elmir R; Pangas J; Dahlen H; Schmied V
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Dec; 26(23-24):4184-4200. PubMed ID: 28722761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A phenomenological study of the effects of clinical negligence litigation on midwives in England: the personal perspective.
    Robertson JH; Thomson AM
    Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e121-30. PubMed ID: 24418203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Experience of Litigation From the Perspective of Midwives in Iran.
    Peyman A; Nayeri ND; Bandboni ME; Moghadam ZB
    J Forensic Nurs; 2017; 13(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 28820774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The birth bed: A qualitative study on the views of midwives regarding the use of the bed in the birth space.
    Townsend B; Fenwick J; Thomson V; Foureur M
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 26386523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From hospital to home: Australian midwives' experiences of transitioning into publicly-funded homebirth programs.
    Coddington R; Catling C; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27594344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.
    Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G; Foster J
    Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():53-61. PubMed ID: 27060401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Midwives and Liability: Results of the 2018 National Midwives and Liability Survey.
    Page K; Aryal S; Guidera M
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 Mar; 67(2):226-234. PubMed ID: 35348290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study.
    Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midwives and liability: results from the 2009 nationwide survey of certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives in the United States.
    Guidera M; McCool W; Hanlon A; Schuiling K; Smith A
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2012; 57(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 22758356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midwives' experiences of working in an obstetric high dependency unit: A qualitative study.
    Eadie IJ; Sheridan NF
    Midwifery; 2017 Apr; 47():1-7. PubMed ID: 28188998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What factors influence midwives' decision to perform or avoid episiotomies? A focus group study.
    Wu LC; Lie D; Malhotra R; Allen JC; Tay JS; Tan TC; Ostbye T
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 23453700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trauma and fear in Australian midwives.
    Toohill J; Fenwick J; Sidebotham M; Gamble J; Creedy DK
    Women Birth; 2019 Feb; 32(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29759933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bearing witness: midwives experiences of witnessing traumatic birth.
    Rice H; Warland J
    Midwifery; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1056-63. PubMed ID: 23415352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midwives' personal experiences of pregnancy and childbirth: Exploring issues of autonomy and agency in relation to the use of professional knowledge.
    Church S
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Sep; 17(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 25116466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is a midwife's continuous presence during childbirth a matter of course? Midwives' experiences and thoughts about factors that may influence their continuous support of women during labour.
    Aune I; Amundsen HH; Skaget Aas LC
    Midwifery; 2014 Jan; 30(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 23473911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.