157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29525976)
1. Investigating the mechanical response of paediatric bone under bending and torsion using finite element analysis.
Altai Z; Viceconti M; Offiah AC; Li X
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 29525976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for predicting fracture loads of the infant femur for injury investigation: an in vitro porcine model.
Pierce MC; Valdevit A; Anderson L; Inoue N; Hauser DL
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 11149504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of a femur to deconstruct the paradox of bone curvature.
Jade S; Tamvada KH; Strait DS; Grosse IR
J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 341():53-63. PubMed ID: 24099719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing CT based computational models of pediatric femurs.
Li X; Viceconti M; Cohen MC; Reilly GC; Carré MJ; Offiah AC
J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2034-40. PubMed ID: 25895643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method.
Matsumoto T; Ohnishi I; Bessho M; Imai K; Ohashi S; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(14):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19525837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic bending tolerance and elastic-plastic material properties of the human femur.
Funk JR; Kerrigan JR; Crandall JR
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2004; 48():215-33. PubMed ID: 15319127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Femur loading in feet-first fall experiments using an anthropomorphic test device.
Thompson A; Bertocci G; Smalley C
J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():25-33. PubMed ID: 29680494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
Andreaus U; Colloca M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element modelling of the developing infant femur using paired CT and MRI scans.
Castro APG; Altai Z; Offiah AC; Shelmerdine SC; Arthurs OJ; Li X; Lacroix D
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218268. PubMed ID: 31211799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis.
Shefelbine SJ; Simon U; Claes L; Gold A; Gabet Y; Bab I; Müller R; Augat P
Bone; 2005 Mar; 36(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 15777656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femur fracture biomechanics and morphology associated with torsional and bending loading conditions in an in vitro immature porcine model.
Bertocci G; Thompson A; Pierce MC
J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():5-11. PubMed ID: 28772157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Importance of asymmetry and anisotropy in predicting cortical bone response and fracture using human body model femur in three-point bending and axial rotation.
Khor F; Cronin DS; Watson B; Gierczycka D; Malcolm S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():213-229. PubMed ID: 30081355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical response of lumbar facet joints under follower preload: a finite element study.
Du CF; Yang N; Guo JC; Huang YP; Zhang C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Mar; 17():126. PubMed ID: 26980002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis.
Tsai A; Coats B; Kleinman PK
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Nov; 47(12):1622-1630. PubMed ID: 28721473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
