These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29527181)

  • 1. Tonal Symmetry Induces Fluency and Sense of Well-Formedness.
    Qiao F; Sun F; Li F; Ling X; Zheng L; Li L; Guo X; Dienes Z
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():165. PubMed ID: 29527181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluency Expresses Implicit Knowledge of Tonal Symmetry.
    Ling X; Li F; Qiao F; Guo X; Dienes Z
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():57. PubMed ID: 26869960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):372-88. PubMed ID: 19932473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning.
    Skosnik PD; Mirza F; Gitelman DR; Parrish TB; Mesulam MM; Reber PJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1306-14. PubMed ID: 12414270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy.
    Jamieson RK; Nevzorova U; Lee G; Mewhort DJ
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 25828458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning.
    Beesley T; Wills AJ; Le Pelley ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20081172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus variation-based training enhances artificial grammar learning.
    Schiff R; Ashkenazi P; Kahta S; Sasson A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Mar; 214():103252. PubMed ID: 33588255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Basis of the Implicit Learning of Complex Artificial Grammar with Nonadjacent Dependencies.
    Ling X; Sun P; Zhao L; Jiang S; Lu Y; Cheng X; Guo X; Zhu X; Zheng L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 34(12):2375-2389. PubMed ID: 36069658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuronal correlates of familiarity-driven decisions in artificial grammar learning.
    Thiel CM; Shanks DR; Henson RN; Dolan RJ
    Neuroreport; 2003 Jan; 14(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12544844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prior familiarity with components enhances unconscious learning of relations.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):413-8. PubMed ID: 20096605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of stimulus repetition on duration judgments with simple stimuli.
    Birngruber T; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1213. PubMed ID: 26347682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AGSuite: Software to conduct feature analysis of artificial grammar learning performance.
    Cook MT; Chubala CM; Jamieson RK
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1639-1651. PubMed ID: 28597235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.
    Shanks DR; Johnstone T; Staggs L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):216-52. PubMed ID: 9080793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do animals learn in artificial grammar studies?
    Beckers GJL; Berwick RC; Okanoya K; Bolhuis JJ
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2017 Oct; 81(Pt B):238-246. PubMed ID: 28017840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit learning deficits among adults with developmental dyslexia.
    Kahta S; Schiff R
    Ann Dyslexia; 2016 Jul; 66(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 26864577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.
    Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of meaning and symmetry on judgments of size.
    Reber R; Christensen BT; Meier B
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1270. PubMed ID: 25408681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Project DyAdd: implicit learning in adult dyslexia and ADHD.
    Laasonen M; Väre J; Oksanen-Hennah H; Leppämäki S; Tani P; Harno H; Hokkanen L; Pothos E; Cleeremans A
    Ann Dyslexia; 2014 Apr; 64(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 24162872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond dissociation logic: evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning.
    Higham PA; Vokey JR; Pritchard JL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Dec; 129(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 11142861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.