These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29527396)
1. How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: Technical note. Guiroy A; Sícoli A; Masanés NG; Ciancio AM; Gagliardi M; Falavigna A Surg Neurol Int; 2018; 9():38. PubMed ID: 29527396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paramedian Wiltse Approach for Giant Paraspinal Lumbar Schwannoma: Technical Note and Alternative Approaches. Wang CP; Flores-Milan G; Liu JKC Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2022 Aug; 23(2):e95-e101. PubMed ID: 35838459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Wiltse approach combined with contralateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional surgery for lumbar disc herniation:a case-control study]. Liao XY; Zhou LJ; Ma WH; Liu GY; Han JM; Xu RM Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Jan; 34(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 33666020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Posterior-Only Approach for Lumbar Circumferential Decompression and Stabilization to Treat Spine Metastasis--Technical Report. Donnelly DJ; Abd-El-Barr MM; Lu Y World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 26100166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of intraoperative CT-neuronavigation in Wiltse approach. A technical note. Battistelli M; Valeri F; D'Ercole M; Izzo A; Rapisarda A; Polli FM; Montano N Front Surg; 2024; 11():1433273. PubMed ID: 39286050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified muscle-sparing paraspinal approach for stabilization and interlaminar decompression: a minimally invasive technique for pedicle screw-based posterior nonfusion stabilization. Anand N; Baron EM; Bray RS SAS J; 2008; 2(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 25802600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical effect of minimally-Invasive surgical-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique associated with percutaneous pedicle screws in micro endoscopy discectomy]. Dai JH; Lin HB; Li X; Wu YY; Zhang HZ; Yu ZX Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 97(11):864-868. PubMed ID: 28355744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical application of self-made minimally invasive hood-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via modified bilateral Wiltse approach in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases]. Gu YC; Zhu L; Hu SL; Xie W; Ji LH; Yan H; Chen W Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Apr; 34(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 33896126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques: Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF. Ge DH; Stekas ND; Varlotta CG; Fischer CR; Petrizzo A; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Errico TJ; Buckland AJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 May; 44(9):E555-E560. PubMed ID: 30325884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Precise application of Traditional Chinese Medicine in minimally-invasive techniques]. Dong FH Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2018 Jun; 31(6):493-496. PubMed ID: 29945400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Video-assisted lateral intertransverse process arthrodesis. Validation of a new minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion technique in the rabbit and nonhuman primate (rhesus) models. Boden SD; Moskovitz PA; Morone MA; Toribitake Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Nov; 21(22):2689-97. PubMed ID: 8961457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Research and Technique Note of TLIF by Wiltse Approach for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar. Jin YM; Chen Q; Chen CY; Lyu J; Shi B; Yang C; Xia C Orthop Surg; 2021 Jul; 13(5):1628-1638. PubMed ID: 34152699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Evolution and Advancement of Endoscopic Foraminal Surgery: One Surgeon's Experience Incorporating Adjunctive Techologies. Yeung AT SAS J; 2007; 1(3):108-17. PubMed ID: 25802587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in damage to CGRP immunoreactive sensory nerves after two lumbar surgical approaches: investigation using humans and rats. Ohtori S; Miyagi M; Takaso M; Inoue G; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Ochiai N; Kishida S; Kuniyoshi K; Nakamura J; Aoki Y; Ishikawa T; Arai G; Kamoda H; Suzuki M; Toyone T; Takahashi K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 21289592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Case-control study on effects of two approaches on multifidus muscle injuries during lumbar interbody fusion of lumbar vertebrae]. Jiang SY; Hu ZJ; Fan SW; Fang XQ Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2013 Sep; 26(9):735-40. PubMed ID: 24416904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A case control study of lumbar fusion surgery with the Wiltse approach and the traditional approach]. Cheng WY; Zeng XX; Xiang X; Liu D; Zheng JP; Hu B Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Oct; 32(10):965-970. PubMed ID: 32512972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidental Durotomy Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed with the Modified Wiltse Approach. Sheinis D; Sheinis V; Benharroch D; Ohana N J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 81(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 32588413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the Wiltse versus midline approaches in degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Street JT; Andrew Glennie R; Dea N; DiPaola C; Wang Z; Boyd M; Paquette SJ; Kwon BK; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 27104286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]