866 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29527740)
21. Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connection Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments.
AlAmar M; Alqahtani F
J Oral Implantol; 2020 Apr; 46(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 31909678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fatigue resistance and fracture strength of narrow-diameter one-piece zirconia implants with angled abutments.
Atalay P; Öztaş DD
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Oct; 34(7):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 35855644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro fatigue and fracture strength testing of one-piece zirconia implant abutments and zirconia implant abutments connected to titanium cores.
Stimmelmayr M; Sagerer S; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):488-93. PubMed ID: 23527351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.
Siadat H; Beyabanaki E; Mousavi N; Alikhasi M
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):271-277. PubMed ID: 28874994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One-piece internal zirconia abutments for single-tooth restorations on narrow and regular diameter implants: A 5-year prospective follow-up study.
Nilsson A; Johansson LÅ; Lindh C; Ekfeldt A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):916-925. PubMed ID: 28791801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro performance of one- and two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application.
Kammermeier A; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Schneider-Feyrer S; Preis V
J Dent; 2016 Oct; 53():94-101. PubMed ID: 27528418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of loading and aging on the fracture strength of an injection-molded two-piece zirconia implant restored with a zirconia abutment.
Kohal RJ; von Schierholz C; Nold J; Spies BC; Adolfsson E; Vach K; Burkhardt F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Feb; 34(2):105-115. PubMed ID: 36444693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.
Yilmaz B; Çakmak G; Batak B; Johnston WM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 33938119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
