BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29527824)

  • 1. Robust identification of deletions in exome and genome sequence data based on clustering of Mendelian errors.
    Manheimer KB; Patel N; Richter F; Gorham J; Tai AC; Homsy J; Boskovski MT; Parfenov M; Goldmuntz E; Chung WK; Brueckner M; Tristani-Firouzi M; Srivastava D; Seidman JG; Seidman CE; Gelb BD; Sharp AJ
    Hum Mutat; 2018 Jun; 39(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29527824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased frequency of de novo copy number variants in congenital heart disease by integrative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism array and exome sequence data.
    Glessner JT; Bick AG; Ito K; Homsy J; Rodriguez-Murillo L; Fromer M; Mazaika E; Vardarajan B; Italia M; Leipzig J; DePalma SR; Golhar R; Sanders SJ; Yamrom B; Ronemus M; Iossifov I; Willsey AJ; State MW; Kaltman JR; White PS; Shen Y; Warburton D; Brueckner M; Seidman C; Goldmuntz E; Gelb BD; Lifton R; Seidman J; Hakonarson H; Chung WK
    Circ Res; 2014 Oct; 115(10):884-896. PubMed ID: 25205790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of de novo assemblers for variation discovery in personal genomes.
    Tian S; Yan H; Klee EW; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):893-904. PubMed ID: 28407084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the performance of copy number variant prediction tools for the detection of deletions from whole genome sequencing data.
    Whitford W; Lehnert K; Snell RG; Jacobsen JC
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Jun; 94():103174. PubMed ID: 30965134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exome sequence read depth methods for identifying copy number changes.
    Kadalayil L; Rafiq S; Rose-Zerilli MJ; Pengelly RJ; Parker H; Oscier D; Strefford JC; Tapper WJ; Gibson J; Ennis S; Collins A
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 May; 16(3):380-92. PubMed ID: 25169955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of genomic deletions causing inherited retinal degenerations by coverage analysis of whole exome sequencing data.
    Khateb S; Hanany M; Khalaileh A; Beryozkin A; Meyer S; Abu-Diab A; Abu Turky F; Mizrahi-Meissonnier L; Lieberman S; Ben-Yosef T; Banin E; Sharon D
    J Med Genet; 2016 Sep; 53(9):600-7. PubMed ID: 27208209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants.
    Belkadi A; Bolze A; Itan Y; Cobat A; Vincent QB; Antipenko A; Shang L; Boisson B; Casanova JL; Abel L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(17):5473-8. PubMed ID: 25827230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validated WGS and WES protocols proved saliva-derived gDNA as an equivalent to blood-derived gDNA for clinical and population genomic analyses.
    Kvapilova K; Misenko P; Radvanszky J; Brzon O; Budis J; Gazdarica J; Pos O; Korabecna M; Kasny M; Szemes T; Kvapil P; Paces J; Kozmik Z
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):187. PubMed ID: 38365587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate in silico confirmation of rare copy number variant calls from exome sequencing data using transfer learning.
    Tan R; Shen Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Nov; 50(21):e123. PubMed ID: 36124672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mendelian Inconsistent Signatures from 1314 Ancestrally Diverse Family Trios Distinguish Biological Variation from Sequencing Error.
    Kothiyal P; Wong WSW; Bodian DL; Niederhuber JE
    J Comput Biol; 2019 May; 26(5):405-419. PubMed ID: 30942611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of somatic copy number estimation tools for whole-exome sequencing data.
    Nam JY; Kim NK; Kim SC; Joung JG; Xi R; Lee S; Park PJ; Park WY
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Mar; 17(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 26210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole-genome sequencing offers additional but limited clinical utility compared with reanalysis of whole-exome sequencing.
    Alfares A; Aloraini T; Subaie LA; Alissa A; Qudsi AA; Alahmad A; Mutairi FA; Alswaid A; Alothaim A; Eyaid W; Albalwi M; Alturki S; Alfadhel M
    Genet Med; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1328-1333. PubMed ID: 29565419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data.
    Tan R; Wang Y; Kleinstein SE; Liu Y; Zhu X; Guo H; Jiang Q; Allen AS; Zhu M
    Hum Mutat; 2014 Jul; 35(7):899-907. PubMed ID: 24599517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic dissection of biases in whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing reveals major determinants of coding sequence coverage.
    Barbitoff YA; Polev DE; Glotov AS; Serebryakova EA; Shcherbakova IV; Kiselev AM; Kostareva AA; Glotov OS; Predeus AV
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2057. PubMed ID: 32029882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Copy number variants calling from WES data through eXome hidden Markov model (XHMM) identifies additional 2.5% pathogenic genomic imbalances smaller than 30 kb undetected by array-CGH.
    Tisserant E; Vitobello A; Callegarin D; Verdez S; Bruel AL; Aho Glele LS; Sorlin A; Viora-Dupont E; Konyukh M; Marle N; Nambot S; Moutton S; Racine C; Garde A; Delanne J; Tran-Mau-Them F; Philippe C; Kuentz P; Poulleau M; Payet M; Poe C; Thauvin-Robinet C; Faivre L; Mosca-Boidron AL; Thevenon J; Duffourd Y; Callier P
    Ann Hum Genet; 2022 Jul; 86(4):171-180. PubMed ID: 35141892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GATK-gCNV enables the discovery of rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data.
    Babadi M; Fu JM; Lee SK; Smirnov AN; Gauthier LD; Walker M; Benjamin DI; Zhao X; Karczewski KJ; Wong I; Collins RL; Sanchis-Juan A; Brand H; Banks E; Talkowski ME
    Nat Genet; 2023 Sep; 55(9):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 37604963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Copy-number variants in clinical genome sequencing: deployment and interpretation for rare and undiagnosed disease.
    Gross AM; Ajay SS; Rajan V; Brown C; Bluske K; Burns NJ; Chawla A; Coffey AJ; Malhotra A; Scocchia A; Thorpe E; Dzidic N; Hovanes K; Sahoo T; Dolzhenko E; Lajoie B; Khouzam A; Chowdhury S; Belmont J; Roller E; Ivakhno S; Tanner S; McEachern J; Hambuch T; Eberle M; Hagelstrom RT; Bentley DR; Perry DL; Taft RJ
    Genet Med; 2019 May; 21(5):1121-1130. PubMed ID: 30293986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole exome and genome sequencing in mendelian disorders: a diagnostic and health economic analysis.
    Ewans LJ; Minoche AE; Schofield D; Shrestha R; Puttick C; Zhu Y; Drew A; Gayevskiy V; Elakis G; Walsh C; Adès LC; Colley A; Ellaway C; Evans CA; Freckmann ML; Goodwin L; Hackett A; Kamien B; Kirk EP; Lipke M; Mowat D; Palmer E; Rajagopalan S; Ronan A; Sachdev R; Stevenson W; Turner A; Wilson M; Worgan L; Morel-Kopp MC; Field M; Buckley MF; Cowley MJ; Dinger ME; Roscioli T
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Oct; 30(10):1121-1131. PubMed ID: 35970915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From cytogenetics to cytogenomics: whole-genome sequencing as a first-line test comprehensively captures the diverse spectrum of disease-causing genetic variation underlying intellectual disability.
    Lindstrand A; Eisfeldt J; Pettersson M; Carvalho CMB; Kvarnung M; Grigelioniene G; Anderlid BM; Bjerin O; Gustavsson P; Hammarsjö A; Georgii-Hemming P; Iwarsson E; Johansson-Soller M; Lagerstedt-Robinson K; Lieden A; Magnusson M; Martin M; Malmgren H; Nordenskjöld M; Norling A; Sahlin E; Stranneheim H; Tham E; Wincent J; Ygberg S; Wedell A; Wirta V; Nordgren A; Lundin J; Nilsson D
    Genome Med; 2019 Nov; 11(1):68. PubMed ID: 31694722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Copy number alterations detected by whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Wang X; Li X; Cheng Y; Sun X; Sun X; Self S; Kooperberg C; Dai JY
    Hum Genomics; 2015 Sep; 9(1):22. PubMed ID: 26374103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.