These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29527866)

  • 1. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients refused from surgery: a different entity?
    Montone RA; Niccoli G
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2018 Oct; 66(5):562-568. PubMed ID: 29527866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the Mayo Clinic experience.
    Alli OO; Singh IM; Holmes DR; Pulido JN; Park SJ; Rihal CS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Nov; 80(5):728-34. PubMed ID: 22378485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CABG for patients with heart dysfunction: when and why to refuse surgery.
    Bruno P; Iafrancesco M; Massetti M
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2018 Oct; 66(5):551-561. PubMed ID: 29687703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coronary revascularization for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
    Nagendran J; Norris CM; Graham MM; Ross DB; Macarthur RG; Kieser TM; Maitland AM; Southern D; Meyer SR;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Dec; 96(6):2038-44. PubMed ID: 23968761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Left ventricular support during complex transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for complete revascularization.
    Dachille A; Focaccio A; Selvetella L; Napolitano G; Briguori C
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2019 Aug; 67(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 29527864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a review and meta-analysis of 19 clinical studies.
    Kunadian V; Pugh A; Zaman AG; Qiu W
    Coron Artery Dis; 2012 Nov; 23(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 22960383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry.
    Maini B; Naidu SS; Mulukutla S; Kleiman N; Schreiber T; Wohns D; Dixon S; Rihal C; Dave R; O'Neill W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Nov; 80(5):717-25. PubMed ID: 22105829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang D; Lyu S; Song X; Yuan F; Xu F; Zhang M; Zhang M
    Angiology; 2017 Jan; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 27069109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of five-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions≤50% versus >50% (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).
    Marui A; Kimura T; Nishiwaki N; Mitsudo K; Komiya T; Hanyu M; Shiomi H; Tanaka S; Sakata R;
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 114(7):988-96. PubMed ID: 25124184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry.
    Sjauw KD; Konorza T; Erbel R; Danna PL; Viecca M; Minden HH; Butter C; Engstrøm T; Hassager C; Machado FP; Pedrazzini G; Wagner DR; Schamberger R; Kerber S; Mathey DG; Schofer J; Engström AE; Henriques JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(25):2430-4. PubMed ID: 20082934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indication and short-term clinical outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with microaxial Impella® pump: results from the German Impella® registry.
    Baumann S; Werner N; Ibrahim K; Westenfeld R; Al-Rashid F; Sinning JM; Westermann D; Schäfer A; Karatolios K; Bauer T; Becher T; Akin I
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 107(8):653-657. PubMed ID: 29520699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Under Cover of Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella 2.5).
    Iftikhar I; Khan HS; Kayani AM; Shahzad H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Oct; 25 Suppl 2():S78-80. PubMed ID: 26522210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovery of Left Ventricular Function After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction.
    Yee NP; Siu AM; Davis J; Kao J
    Hawaii J Med Public Health; 2016 Sep; 75(9):273-7. PubMed ID: 27688953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Without Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Function.
    Alaswad K; Basir MB; Khandelwal A; Schreiber T; Lombardi W; O'Neill W
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 121(6):703-708. PubMed ID: 29370923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: The role of revascularization.
    Aksut B; Starling R; Kapadia S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):777-783. PubMed ID: 28707392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamics and its predictors during Impella-protected PCI in high risk patients with reduced ejection fraction.
    Russo G; Burzotta F; D'Amario D; Ribichini F; Piccoli A; Paraggio L; Previ L; Pesarini G; Porto I; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Aurigemma C; Verdirosi D; Trani C; Crea F
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Jan; 274():221-225. PubMed ID: 30057165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six months follow-up of protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the microaxial Impella pump: results from the German Impella registry.
    Baumann S; Werner N; Al-Rashid F; Schäfer A; Bauer T; Sotoudeh R; Bojara W; Shamekhi J; Sinning JM; Becher T; Eder F; Akin I
    Coron Artery Dis; 2020 May; 31(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 31658135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of mechanical left ventricular unloading by Impella on left ventricular dynamics in high-risk and primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients.
    Remmelink M; Sjauw KD; Henriques JP; de Winter RJ; Vis MM; Koch KT; Paulus WJ; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Piek JJ; Baan J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Feb; 75(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 19941329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Surgical Consultation on Outcomes in Hemodynamically Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From PROTECT II Randomized Study.
    Shavelle DM; Kirtane AJ; Schreiber TL; Kapasi NK; O'Neill WW; Moses JW; Popma J; Matthews RV
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 May; 28(5):187-92. PubMed ID: 26887029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).
    Marui A; Kimura T; Nishiwaki N; Mitsudo K; Komiya T; Hanyu M; Shiomi H; Tanaka S; Sakata R;
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 114(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 24996550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.