These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29528559)

  • 1. Improving large class performance and engagement through student-generated question banks.
    Hancock D; Hare N; Denny P; Denyer G
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2018 Jul; 46(4):306-317. PubMed ID: 29528559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
    Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: Enhancing student engagement and learning.
    Nguyen KA; Lucas C; Leadbeatter D
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 Aug; 24(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 32347592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study.
    Craft JA; Christensen M; Shaw N; Bakon S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Dec; 59():6-11. PubMed ID: 28898728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microlearning activities improve student comprehension of difficult concepts and performance in a biochemistry course.
    Nowak G; Speed O; Vuk J
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2023 Jan; 15(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 36898885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embedding retrieval practice in undergraduate biochemistry teaching using PeerWise.
    Higgins T; Dudley E; Bodger O; Newton P; Francis N
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2024; 52(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 37929789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structured academic discussions through an online education-specific platform to improve Pharm.D. students learning outcomes.
    Kolluru S; Varughese JT
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017; 9(2):230-236. PubMed ID: 29233408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open problem-based instruction impacts understanding of physiological concepts differently in undergraduate students.
    Franklin BM; Xiang L; Collett JA; Rhoads MK; Osborn JL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Dec; 39(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 26628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association Between Dental Student-Developed Exam Questions and Learning at Higher Cognitive Levels.
    Gonzalez-Cabezas C; Anderson OS; Wright MC; Fontana M
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1295-304. PubMed ID: 26522634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing student retention of prerequisite knowledge through pre-class activities and in-class reinforcement.
    Taylor AT; Olofson EL; Novak WR
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2017 Mar; 45(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 27537100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the effectiveness of a practical inquiry-based learning bioinformatics module on undergraduate student engagement and applied skills.
    Brown JA
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016 May; 44(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 27161812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
    Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a self-report instrument for measuring in-class student engagement reveals that pretending to engage is a significant unrecognized problem.
    Fuller KA; Karunaratne NS; Naidu S; Exintaris B; Short JL; Wolcott MD; Singleton S; White PJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205828. PubMed ID: 30332460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SOLO-based task to improve self-evaluation and capacity to integrate concepts in first-year physiology students.
    Williams MT; Lluka LJ; Meyer JHF; Chunduri P
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2019 Dec; 43(4):486-494. PubMed ID: 31553641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diverse assessment and active student engagement sustain deep learning: A comparative study of outcomes in two parallel introductory biochemistry courses.
    Bevan SJ; Chan CW; Tanner JA
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2014; 42(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 25345780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Student Learning with Generated and Answered Peer-written Questions.
    Hudson SL; Jarstfer MB; Persky AM
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Mar; 82(2):6315. PubMed ID: 29606713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.