153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29528918)
1. Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Early Elective Deliveries and Improve Birth Registry Accuracy.
Kaplan HC; King E; White BE; Ford SE; Fuller S; Krew MA; Marcotte MP; Iams JD; Bailit JL; Bouchard JM; Friar K; Lannon CM
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 131(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 29528918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multistate quality improvement program to decrease elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation.
Oshiro BT; Kowalewski L; Sappenfield W; Alter CC; Bettegowda VR; Russell R; Curran J; Reeves L; Kacica M; Andino N; Mason-Marti P; Crouse D; Knight S; Littlejohn K; Malatok S; Dudley DJ; Berns SD
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 121(5):1025-1031. PubMed ID: 23635739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The perinatal quality collaborative of North Carolina's 39 weeks project: a quality improvement program to decrease elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation.
Berrien K; Devente J; French A; Cochran KM; McCaffrey M; Horton BJ; Chescheir N
N C Med J; 2014; 75(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 24830487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Non-Medically Indicated Scheduled Deliveries.
Kacica MA; Glantz JC; Xiong K; Shields EP; Cherouny PH
Matern Child Health J; 2017 Apr; 21(4):932-941. PubMed ID: 27987105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using a State Birth Registry as a Quality Improvement Tool.
Lannon C; Kaplan HC; Friar K; Fuller S; Ford S; White B; Besl J; Paulson J; Marcotte M; Krew M; Bailit J; Iams J
Am J Perinatol; 2017 Aug; 34(10):958-965. PubMed ID: 28329895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Feasibility of Tracking Elective Deliveries Prior to 39 Gestational Weeks: Lessons From Three California Projects.
Korst LM; Fridman M; Estarziau M; Gregory KD; Mitchell C
Matern Child Health J; 2015 Oct; 19(10):2128-37. PubMed ID: 25656731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0/7)-38(6/7) weeks' gestation.
Donovan EF; Lannon C; Bailit J; Rose B; Iams JD; Byczkowski T;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):243.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20207241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data.
Bailit JL;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):269.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20816150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrepancy Between Identification of Early-Term Elective Deliveries by Manual Chart Review and Data Vendor.
Yamasato K; Tsai PS; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
Hawaii J Med Public Health; 2016 Dec; 75(12):367-372. PubMed ID: 27980880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a Tennessee statewide initiative to reduce early elective deliveries using quasi-experimental methods.
Thompson MP; Graetz I; McKillop CN; Grubb PH; Waters TM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 19(1):208. PubMed ID: 30940130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in the indications for scheduled births to reduce nonmedically indicated deliveries occurring before 39 weeks of gestation.
Bailit JL; Iams J; Silber A; Krew M; McKenna D; Marcotte M; Donovan E;
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 22825080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decreasing elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in an integrated health care system.
Oshiro BT; Henry E; Wilson J; Branch DW; Varner MW;
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 113(4):804-811. PubMed ID: 19305323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early elective deliveries accounted for nearly 9 percent of births paid for by Medicaid.
Fowler TT; Schiff J; Applegate MS; Griffith K; Fairbrother GL
Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Dec; 33(12):2170-8. PubMed ID: 25489035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing the Primary Cesarean Birth Rate: A Quality Improvement Project.
Javernick JA; Dempsey A
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 62(4):477-483. PubMed ID: 28703927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labor induction process improvement: a patient quality-of-care initiative.
Fisch JM; English D; Pedaline S; Brooks K; Simhan HN
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 113(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 19305322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction rates and delivery outcomes after a policy limiting elective inductions.
Yamasato K; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
Matern Child Health J; 2015 May; 19(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 25272996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decline in early elective deliveries across the United States.
Kwong W
CMAJ; 2014 May; 186(8):E244. PubMed ID: 24733764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Texas Medicaid Payment Reform: Fewer Early Elective Deliveries And Increased Gestational Age And Birthweight.
Dahlen HM; McCullough JM; Fertig AR; Dowd BE; Riley WJ
Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Mar; 36(3):460-467. PubMed ID: 28264947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
