These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29529138)

  • 1. Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know.
    Dunn KH; Eastlake AC; Story M; Kuempel ED
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 29529138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can Control Banding be Useful for the Safe Handling of Nanomaterials? A Systematic Review.
    Eastlake A; Zumwalde R; Geraci C
    J Nanopart Res; 2016; 18():. PubMed ID: 27471426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Workshop report: strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.
    Gordon SC; Butala JH; Carter JM; Elder A; Gordon T; Gray G; Sayre PG; Schulte PA; Tsai CS; West J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 68(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 24462629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterizing risk assessments for the development of occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.
    Schulte PA; Kuempel ED; Drew NM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 95():207-219. PubMed ID: 29574195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials: a Review of Workplace Exposure Assessment Methods.
    McCormick S; Niang M; Dahm MM
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2021 Sep; 8(3):223-234. PubMed ID: 34101152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Systematic Review of the Routes and Forms of Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Basinas I; Jiménez AS; Galea KS; Tongeren MV; Hurley F
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Jul; 62(6):639-662. PubMed ID: 29931230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards health-based nano reference values (HNRVs) for occupational exposure: Recommendations from an expert panel.
    Visser M; Gosens I; Bard D; van Broekhuizen P; Janer G; Kuempel E; Riediker M; Vogel U; Dekkers S
    NanoImpact; 2022 Apr; 26():100396. PubMed ID: 35560294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical evaluation of the fish early-life stage toxicity test for engineered nanomaterials: experimental modifications and recommendations.
    Shaw BJ; Liddle CC; Windeatt KM; Handy RD
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 90(9):2077-2107. PubMed ID: 27318802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
    Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing workforces exposed to current and emerging non-carbonaceous nanomaterials in the U.S.
    Babik KR; Dahm MM; Dunn KH; Dunn KL; Schubauer-Berigan MK
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Jan; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 29053929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informing selection of nanomaterial concentrations for ToxCast in vitro testing based on occupational exposure potential.
    Gangwal S; Brown JS; Wang A; Houck KA; Dix DJ; Kavlock RJ; Hubal EA
    Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Nov; 119(11):1539-46. PubMed ID: 21788197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing applications, exposure risks, and hazard communication for engineered nanomaterials in construction.
    Lippy BE; Brooks SB; Cooper MR; Burrelli LG; Saldivar A; West GH
    Am J Ind Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38837413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control Banding and the Global Rise of Qualitative Risk Assessment Strategies.
    Halbach JH; Cala JM; Paik SY; Zalk DM
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2023 Dec; 10(4):410-416. PubMed ID: 37884803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanomaterials in Plants: A Review of Hazard and Applications in the Agri-Food Sector.
    Kranjc E; Drobne D
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2019 Jul; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 31366106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Systematic Review of Reported Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Debia M; Bakhiyi B; Ostiguy C; Verbeek JH; Brouwer DH; Murashov V
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Oct; 60(8):916-35. PubMed ID: 27422281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterial environmental emissions.
    Tolaymat T; El Badawy A; Genaidy A; Abdelraheem W; Swqueria R
    J Clean Prod; 2017 Feb; 143():401-412. PubMed ID: 32489231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How safe is control banding? Integrated evaluation by comparing OELs with measurement data and using monte carlo simulation.
    Tischer M; Bredendiek-Kämper S; Poppek U; Packroff R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):449-62. PubMed ID: 19531808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aquatic Mesocosm Strategies for the Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Carboni A; Slomberg DL; Nassar M; Santaella C; Masion A; Rose J; Auffan M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 55(24):16270-16282. PubMed ID: 34854667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Searching for global descriptors of engineered nanomaterial fate and transport in the environment.
    Westerhoff P; Nowack B
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):844-53. PubMed ID: 22950943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool.
    Zalk DM; Paik SY; Chase WD
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Oct; 63(8):898-917. PubMed ID: 31433845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.