These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
777 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29529660)
21. Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up. de l'Escalopier N; Dumaine V; Auberger G; Babinet A; Courpied JP; Anract P; Hamadouche M Int Orthop; 2020 Feb; 44(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31758218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What is the failure rate of constrained liners in complex revision total hip arthroplasty? Unter Ecker N; Piakong P; Delgado G; Gehrke T; Citak M; Ohlmeier M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 35377048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA. Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What Is the Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Proximal Femoral Replacement with Dual-mobility Articulation After Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip Infection? Theil C; Schwarze J; Smolle MA; PĆ¼tzler J; Moellenbeck B; Schneider KN; Schulze M; Klingebiel S; Gosheger G Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Sep; 481(9):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 36897193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA? Baek SH; Kim WK; Kim JY; Kim SY Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3796-802. PubMed ID: 26126991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Hamadouche M; Ropars M; Rodaix C; Musset T; Gaucher F; Biau D; Courpied JP; Huten D Int Orthop; 2017 Mar; 41(3):513-519. PubMed ID: 27889840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The use of a constrained cementless acetabular component for instability in total hip replacement. Rady AE; Asal MK; Bassiony AA Hip Int; 2010; 20(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 21157746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients. Harwin SF; Sodhi N; Ehiorobo J; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():367-370. PubMed ID: 30500976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up. Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cementation of a Dual Mobility Construct in Recurrently Dislocating and High Risk Patients Undergoing Revision Total Arthroplasty. Chalmers BP; Ledford CK; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1501-1506. PubMed ID: 29273288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Otto Aufranc Award: Crosslinking Reduces THA Wear, Osteolysis, and Revision Rates at 15-year Followup Compared With Noncrosslinked Polyethylene. Hopper RH; Ho H; Sritulanondha S; Williams AC; Engh CA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):279-290. PubMed ID: 29529656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conversion of Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing a Dual-Mobility Construct Compared With Large Femoral Heads. Chalmers BP; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3071-3075. PubMed ID: 28579448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years. Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Early intraprosthetic dislocation in a revision dual-mobility hip prosthesis. Banka TR; Ast MP; Parks ML Orthopedics; 2014 Apr; 37(4):e395-7. PubMed ID: 24762847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls). Huten D; Fournier Y; Gicquel T; Bertho P; Basselot F; Hamadouche M Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 31153859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision. Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence. Hernigou P; Tannyeres P; Barbier O; Chenaie P Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Standard, Large-Head, Dual-Mobility, or Constrained-Liner Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for a Diagnosis of Dislocation: An Analysis of 1,275 Revision Total Hip Replacements. Hoskins W; Bingham R; Hatton A; de Steiger RN J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Dec; 102(23):2060-2067. PubMed ID: 33264216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]