590 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29529665)
1. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.
Del Gaizo DJ; Kancherla V; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 22090355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Is the Survivorship of Revision Surgery Performed for the Chronically Dislocated THA?
Brown TS; McLaughlin RJ; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Trousdale RT; Sierra RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):374-379. PubMed ID: 30794225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?
Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 29529660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 19582528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.
Civinini R; Carulli C; Matassi F; Nistri L; Innocenti M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3542-8. PubMed ID: 22700131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.
Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy for Pre- and Early Osteoarthritis Secondary to Dysplasia Provides Durable Results at 20 Years.
Yasunaga Y; Ochi M; Yamasaki T; Shoji T; Izumi S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2145-53. PubMed ID: 27121873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of dual mobility cup cemented into a tantalum acetabular shell for hip revision with large bone loss can decrease dislocation risk without increasing the risk of mechanical failure.
Hitz O; Le Baron M; Jacquet C; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Flecher X
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103739. PubMed ID: 37918693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?
Berasi CC; Berend KR; Adams JB; Ruh EL; Lombardi AV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 25315276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
