138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29529983)
1. Selecting for Disabilities: Selection Versus Modification.
Shaw J
New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 29529983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child?
Wallis JM
Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Mar; 23(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 31542873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disabled by Design: Justifying and Limiting Parental Authority to Choose Future Children with Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis.
Stramondo J
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2017; 27(4):475-500. PubMed ID: 29307878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships.
Rehmann-Sutter C
New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 29529985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In defense of prenatal genetic interventions.
Murphy TF
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):335-42. PubMed ID: 23025348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. There is a difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child.
Häyry M
J Med Ethics; 2004 Oct; 30(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 15467091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Who should pay for bad genes?
Rakowski E
Calif Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 90(5):1345-414. PubMed ID: 12436972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
Savulescu J
Bioethics; 2001 Oct; 15(5-6):413-26. PubMed ID: 12058767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection.
Kemper JM; Gyngell C; Savulescu J
J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Sep; 16(3):405-414. PubMed ID: 31418161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ethical aspects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)].
Mauron A
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2011; 195(4-5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 22375368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eugenic selection benefits embryos.
Walker M
Bioethics; 2014 Jun; 28(5):214-24. PubMed ID: 22845885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents?
Cavaliere G
Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Jun; 21(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28725950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defending eugenics : From cryptic choice to conscious selection.
Anomaly J
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2018 Jul; 35(1-4):24-35. PubMed ID: 29804244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation, assisted reproductive technologies and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
Güell Pelayo F
Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):427-43. PubMed ID: 25684382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing disabilities and enhancements in children: a choice too far?
Murphy TF
Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 18 Suppl 1():43-9. PubMed ID: 19281664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What are parents for? Reproductive ethics after the nonidentity problem.
Prusak BG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(2):37-47. PubMed ID: 20391848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Procreative altruism: beyond individualism in reproductive selection.
Douglas T; Devolder K
J Med Philos; 2013 Aug; 38(4):400-19. PubMed ID: 23856478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
V Hammerstein AL; Eggel M; Biller-Andorno N
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 31752935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past.
Iltis AS
J Med Ethics; 2016 Jun; 42(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 27161556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics and the future of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Robertson JA
Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():97-101. PubMed ID: 15820017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
