These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29530500)

  • 1. Cluster-based upper body marker models for three-dimensional kinematic analysis: Comparison with an anatomical model and reliability analysis.
    Boser QA; Valevicius AM; Lavoie EB; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Hebert JS; Vette AH
    J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 72():228-234. PubMed ID: 29530500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of optical motion capture for the analysis of normative upper body kinematics during functional upper limb tasks: A systematic review.
    Valevicius AM; Jun PY; Hebert JS; Vette AH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Jun; 40():1-15. PubMed ID: 29533202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of normative angular joint kinematics during two functional upper limb tasks.
    Valevicius AM; Boser QA; Lavoie EB; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Hebert JS; Vette AH
    Gait Posture; 2019 Mar; 69():176-186. PubMed ID: 30769260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of upper limb and trunk joint angles in healthy adults during activities of daily living.
    Engdahl SM; Gates DH
    Gait Posture; 2018 Feb; 60():41-47. PubMed ID: 29153478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified conventional gait model versus cluster tracking: Test-retest reliability, agreement and impact of inverse kinematics with joint constraints on kinematic and kinetic data.
    Mentiplay BF; Clark RA
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():75-83. PubMed ID: 29879631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing kinematic variability during performance of Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.
    Kontson KL; Wang S; Barovsky S; Bloomer C; Wozniczka L; Civillico EF
    J Hand Ther; 2020; 33(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 30857890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative whole-body marker set to accurately and reliably quantify joint kinematics during load carriage.
    Lenton GK; Doyle TLA; Saxby DJ; Lloyd DG
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():318-324. PubMed ID: 28411551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-based approach for human kinematics reconstruction from markerless and marker-based motion analysis systems.
    Sholukha V; Bonnechere B; Salvia P; Moiseev F; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2363-71. PubMed ID: 23972432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA): Inter-site validation of a visuomotor upper limb functional protocol.
    Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0219333. PubMed ID: 31887218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between-day reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis of the trunk: A comparison of marker based protocols.
    Rast FM; Graf ES; Meichtry A; Kool J; Bauer CM
    J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):807-811. PubMed ID: 26920506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prescribing joint co-ordinates during model preparation to improve inverse kinematic estimates of elbow joint angles.
    Wells DJ; Alderson JA; Dunne J; Elliott BC; Donnelly CJ
    J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 51():111-117. PubMed ID: 27939351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Motion Analysis Systems in Tracking Upper Body Movement of Myoelectric Bypass Prosthesis Users.
    Wang SL; Civillico G; Niswander W; Kontson KL
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 35458943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An upper limb model proposal for multi-body optimisation: effects of anatomical constraints on the kinematics.
    Naaim A; El Habachi A; Moissenet F; Dumas R; Chèze L
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17 Suppl 1():90-1. PubMed ID: 25074179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the global optimisation method within the upper limb kinematics analysis.
    Roux E; Bouilland S; Godillon-Maquinghen AP; Bouttens D
    J Biomech; 2002 Sep; 35(9):1279-83. PubMed ID: 12163317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marker-Based Method for Analyzing the Three-Dimensional Upper Body Kinematics of Violinists: Reproducibility.
    Wolf E; Möller D; Ballenberger N; Morisse K; Zalpour C
    Med Probl Perform Art; 2022 Sep; 37(3):176-191. PubMed ID: 36053495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new kinematic model of the upper extremity based on functional joint parameter determination for shoulder and elbow.
    Rettig O; Fradet L; Kasten P; Raiss P; Wolf SI
    Gait Posture; 2009 Nov; 30(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 19651514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A strathclyde cluster model for gait kinematic measurement using functional methods: a study of inter-assessor reliability analysis with comparison to anatomical models.
    Meng L; Millar L; Childs C; Buis A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Sep; 23(12):844-853. PubMed ID: 32543962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments.
    Alt Murphy M; Murphy S; Persson HC; Bergström UB; Sunnerhagen KS
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Mar; (133):. PubMed ID: 29658937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical frame identification and reconstruction for repeatable lower limb joint kinematics estimates.
    Donati M; Camomilla V; Vannozzi G; Cappozzo A
    J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2219-26. PubMed ID: 18550066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of the ELEPAP clinical protocol for the 3D kinematic evaluation of upper limb function.
    Vanezis A; Robinson MA; Darras N
    Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):431-9. PubMed ID: 25534948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.