220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29530500)
1. Cluster-based upper body marker models for three-dimensional kinematic analysis: Comparison with an anatomical model and reliability analysis.
Boser QA; Valevicius AM; Lavoie EB; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Hebert JS; Vette AH
J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 72():228-234. PubMed ID: 29530500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of optical motion capture for the analysis of normative upper body kinematics during functional upper limb tasks: A systematic review.
Valevicius AM; Jun PY; Hebert JS; Vette AH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Jun; 40():1-15. PubMed ID: 29533202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of normative angular joint kinematics during two functional upper limb tasks.
Valevicius AM; Boser QA; Lavoie EB; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Hebert JS; Vette AH
Gait Posture; 2019 Mar; 69():176-186. PubMed ID: 30769260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of upper limb and trunk joint angles in healthy adults during activities of daily living.
Engdahl SM; Gates DH
Gait Posture; 2018 Feb; 60():41-47. PubMed ID: 29153478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified conventional gait model versus cluster tracking: Test-retest reliability, agreement and impact of inverse kinematics with joint constraints on kinematic and kinetic data.
Mentiplay BF; Clark RA
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():75-83. PubMed ID: 29879631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing kinematic variability during performance of Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.
Kontson KL; Wang S; Barovsky S; Bloomer C; Wozniczka L; Civillico EF
J Hand Ther; 2020; 33(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 30857890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An alternative whole-body marker set to accurately and reliably quantify joint kinematics during load carriage.
Lenton GK; Doyle TLA; Saxby DJ; Lloyd DG
Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():318-324. PubMed ID: 28411551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model-based approach for human kinematics reconstruction from markerless and marker-based motion analysis systems.
Sholukha V; Bonnechere B; Salvia P; Moiseev F; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2363-71. PubMed ID: 23972432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA): Inter-site validation of a visuomotor upper limb functional protocol.
Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0219333. PubMed ID: 31887218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Between-day reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis of the trunk: A comparison of marker based protocols.
Rast FM; Graf ES; Meichtry A; Kool J; Bauer CM
J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):807-811. PubMed ID: 26920506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prescribing joint co-ordinates during model preparation to improve inverse kinematic estimates of elbow joint angles.
Wells DJ; Alderson JA; Dunne J; Elliott BC; Donnelly CJ
J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 51():111-117. PubMed ID: 27939351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Motion Analysis Systems in Tracking Upper Body Movement of Myoelectric Bypass Prosthesis Users.
Wang SL; Civillico G; Niswander W; Kontson KL
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 35458943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An upper limb model proposal for multi-body optimisation: effects of anatomical constraints on the kinematics.
Naaim A; El Habachi A; Moissenet F; Dumas R; Chèze L
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17 Suppl 1():90-1. PubMed ID: 25074179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the global optimisation method within the upper limb kinematics analysis.
Roux E; Bouilland S; Godillon-Maquinghen AP; Bouttens D
J Biomech; 2002 Sep; 35(9):1279-83. PubMed ID: 12163317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marker-Based Method for Analyzing the Three-Dimensional Upper Body Kinematics of Violinists: Reproducibility.
Wolf E; Möller D; Ballenberger N; Morisse K; Zalpour C
Med Probl Perform Art; 2022 Sep; 37(3):176-191. PubMed ID: 36053495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new kinematic model of the upper extremity based on functional joint parameter determination for shoulder and elbow.
Rettig O; Fradet L; Kasten P; Raiss P; Wolf SI
Gait Posture; 2009 Nov; 30(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 19651514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A strathclyde cluster model for gait kinematic measurement using functional methods: a study of inter-assessor reliability analysis with comparison to anatomical models.
Meng L; Millar L; Childs C; Buis A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Sep; 23(12):844-853. PubMed ID: 32543962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments.
Alt Murphy M; Murphy S; Persson HC; Bergström UB; Sunnerhagen KS
J Vis Exp; 2018 Mar; (133):. PubMed ID: 29658937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomical frame identification and reconstruction for repeatable lower limb joint kinematics estimates.
Donati M; Camomilla V; Vannozzi G; Cappozzo A
J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2219-26. PubMed ID: 18550066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reliability of the ELEPAP clinical protocol for the 3D kinematic evaluation of upper limb function.
Vanezis A; Robinson MA; Darras N
Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):431-9. PubMed ID: 25534948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
