309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29530834)
1. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
Brown J; Drury L; Crane EK; Anderson WE; Tait DL; Higgins RV; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):902-909. PubMed ID: 30240899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy (mLPS-RH) vs laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy (LESS-RH) in early stage cervical cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Fagotti A; Ghezzi F; Boruta DM; Scambia G; Escobar P; Fader AN; Malzoni M; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 24768978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Timing of robotic hysterectomy after cervical excisional procedure.
Melnikoff AK; Doo DW; Cohen AC; Landers E; Walters-Haygood C; McGwin G; Straughn JM; Kim KH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Sep; 29(7):1110-1115. PubMed ID: 31366570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Factors and Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
Kim JH; Shim SH; Nam SH; Lee SW; Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 32084588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction plus HIPEC versus open surgery plus HIPEC in isolated relapse from ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study on perioperative outcomes.
Fagotti A; Costantini B; Gallotta V; Cianci S; Ronsini C; Petrillo M; Pacciani M; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):428-32. PubMed ID: 25461683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
