These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29531234)

  • 1. Influence of fecal collection conditions and 16S rRNA gene sequencing at two centers on human gut microbiota analysis.
    Penington JS; Penno MAS; Ngui KM; Ajami NJ; Roth-Schulze AJ; Wilcox SA; Bandala-Sanchez E; Wentworth JM; Barry SC; Brown CY; Couper JJ; Petrosino JF; Papenfuss AT; Harrison LC;
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4386. PubMed ID: 29531234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
    Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
    Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
    Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
    Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fecal Aliquot Straw Technique (FAST) allows for easy and reproducible subsampling: assessing interpersonal variation in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) accumulation.
    Romano KA; Dill-McFarland KA; Kasahara K; Kerby RL; Vivas EI; Amador-Noguez D; Herd P; Rey FE
    Microbiome; 2018 May; 6(1):91. PubMed ID: 29776435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
    Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
    Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.
    Short MI; Hudson R; Besasie BD; Reveles KR; Shah DP; Nicholson S; Johnson-Pais TL; Weldon K; Lai Z; Leach RJ; Fongang B; Liss MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 33446094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
    Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
    mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.
    Dominianni C; Wu J; Hayes RB; Ahn J
    BMC Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24758293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapidly Processed Stool Swabs Approximate Stool Microbiota Profiles.
    Bokulich NA; Maldonado J; Kang DW; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Caporaso JG
    mSphere; 2019 Apr; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 30971445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
    Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
    mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags.
    Wu GD; Lewis JD; Hoffmann C; Chen YY; Knight R; Bittinger K; Hwang J; Chen J; Berkowsky R; Nessel L; Li H; Bushman FD
    BMC Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 10():206. PubMed ID: 20673359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
    Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
    Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
    mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
    Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
    Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
    Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gut microbiome comparability of fresh-frozen versus stabilized-frozen samples from hospitalized patients using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
    Ilett EE; Jørgensen M; Noguera-Julian M; Daugaard G; Murray DD; Helleberg M; Paredes R; Lundgren J; Sengeløv H; MacPherson C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13351. PubMed ID: 31527823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility, stability, and accuracy of microbial profiles by fecal sample collection method in three distinct populations.
    Byrd DA; Chen J; Vogtmann E; Hullings A; Song SJ; Amir A; Kibriya MG; Ahsan H; Chen Y; Nelson H; Knight R; Shi J; Chia N; Sinha R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224757. PubMed ID: 31738775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.