These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29532217)
1. Z-LASIK and Trans-PRK for correction of high-grade myopia: safety, efficacy, predictability and clinical outcomes. Gershoni A; Mimouni M; Livny E; Bahar I Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 39(4):753-763. PubMed ID: 29532217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LASIK versus photorefractive keratectomy for high myopic (> 3 diopter) astigmatism. Katz T; Wagenfeld L; Galambos P; Darrelmann BG; Richard G; Linke SJ J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):824-31. PubMed ID: 24202704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femtosecond laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) yields better results than transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (Trans-PRK) for correction of low to moderate grade myopia. Gershoni A; Reitblat O; Mimouni M; Livny E; Nahum Y; Bahar I Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):2914-2922. PubMed ID: 33307790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism: six and 12 month outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Stojanovic A; Nitter TA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Aug; 27(8):1263-77. PubMed ID: 11524200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual outcomes after Epi-LASIK and PRK for low and moderate myopia. Sia RK; Coe CD; Edwards JD; Ryan DS; Bower KS J Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 28(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 21985667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia. Van Gelder RN; Steger-May K; Yang SH; Rattanatam T; Pepose JS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Mar; 28(3):462-76. PubMed ID: 11973093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK Versus PRK: Comparison of 6-Month Visual Acuity and Quality Outcome for High Myopia. Hashemi H; Miraftab M; Ghaffari R; Asgari S Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Nov; 42(6):354-357. PubMed ID: 26657666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality. Hashemi H; Ghaffari R; Miraftab M; Asgari S Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):995-1001. PubMed ID: 27699605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Steinert RF; Hersh PS Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism. Kasetsuwan N; Puangsricharern V; Pariyakanok L J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Feb; 83(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 10710888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for the treatment of compound hyperopic astigmatism. El-Agha MS; Bowman RW; Cavanagh D; McCulley JP J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 May; 29(5):900-7. PubMed ID: 12781273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis. Luger MH; Ewering T; Arba-Mosquera S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 27956284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Refractive outcomes comparing small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Han T; Shang J; Zhou X; Xu Y; Ang M; Zhou X J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 46(3):419-427. PubMed ID: 32142040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Refractive outcomes of high-magnitude astigmatism correction using femtosecond LASIK versus transepithelial PRK. Reitblat O; Gershoni A; Mimouni M; Vainer I; Livny E; Nahum Y; Segev F; Bahar I Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):2923-2931. PubMed ID: 33295217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical results between trans-PRK and femtosecond LASIK for correction of high myopia. Zhang J; Feng Q; Ding W; Peng Y; Long K BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):243. PubMed ID: 32560634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Hersh PS; Brint SF; Maloney RK; Durrie DS; Gordon M; Michelson MA; Thompson VM; Berkeley RB; Schein OD; Steinert RF Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug; 105(8):1512-22, discussion 1522-3. PubMed ID: 9709767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia of -6.00 diopters or less. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group. Tole DM; McCarty DJ; Couper T; Taylor HR J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11201777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. El-Maghraby A; Salah T; Waring GO; Klyce S; Ibrahim O Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study. Pop M; Payette Y Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 10690820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]