These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Generalizing polygenic risk scores from Europeans to Hispanics/Latinos. Grinde KE; Qi Q; Thornton TA; Liu S; Shadyab AH; Chan KHK; Reiner AP; Sofer T Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 43(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 30368908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome-Wide Association Study of Suicide Death and Polygenic Prediction of Clinical Antecedents. Docherty AR; Shabalin AA; DiBlasi E; Monson E; Mullins N; Adkins DE; Bacanu SA; Bakian AV; Crowell S; Chen D; Darlington TM; Callor WB; Christensen ED; Gray D; Keeshin B; Klein M; Anderson JS; Jerominski L; Hayward C; Porteous DJ; McIntosh A; Li Q; Coon H Am J Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 177(10):917-927. PubMed ID: 32998551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics. Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores. Vilhjálmsson BJ; Yang J; Finucane HK; Gusev A; Lindström S; Ripke S; Genovese G; Loh PR; Bhatia G; Do R; Hayeck T; Won HH; ; Kathiresan S; Pato M; Pato C; Tamimi R; Stahl E; Zaitlen N; Pasaniuc B; Belbin G; Kenny EE; Schierup MH; De Jager P; Patsopoulos NA; McCarroll S; Daly M; Purcell S; Chasman D; Neale B; Goddard M; Visscher PM; Kraft P; Patterson N; Price AL Am J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 97(4):576-92. PubMed ID: 26430803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association test based on SNP set: logistic kernel machine based test vs. principal component analysis. Zhao Y; Chen F; Zhai R; Lin X; Diao N; Christiani DC PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44978. PubMed ID: 23028716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Weighted SNP set analysis in genome-wide association study. Dai H; Zhao Y; Qian C; Cai M; Zhang R; Chu M; Dai J; Hu Z; Shen H; Chen F PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75897. PubMed ID: 24098741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PUMAS: fine-tuning polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics. Zhao Z; Yi Y; Song J; Wu Y; Zhong X; Lin Y; Hohman TJ; Fletcher J; Lu Q Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):257. PubMed ID: 34488838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method combining a random forest-based technique with the modeling of linkage disequilibrium through latent variables, to run multilocus genome-wide association studies. Sinoquet C BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):106. PubMed ID: 29587628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Leveraging existing GWAS summary data of genetically correlated and uncorrelated traits to improve power for a new GWAS. Xue H; Wu C; Pan W Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):717-732. PubMed ID: 32677173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A principal component approach to improve association testing with polygenic risk scores. Coombes BJ; Ploner A; Bergen SE; Biernacka JM Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):676-686. PubMed ID: 32691445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating European GWAS findings improve polygenic risk prediction accuracy of breast cancer among East Asians. Ji Y; Long J; Kweon SS; Kang D; Kubo M; Park B; Shu XO; Zheng W; Tao R; Li B Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 45(5):471-484. PubMed ID: 33739539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors. Ge T; Chen CY; Ni Y; Feng YA; Smoller JW Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1776. PubMed ID: 30992449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]