These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29533239)

  • 1. Model validation: local diagnosis, correction and when to quit.
    Richardson JS; Williams CJ; Hintze BJ; Chen VB; Prisant MG; Videau LL; Richardson DC
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2018 Feb; 74(Pt 2):132-142. PubMed ID: 29533239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.
    Chen VB; Arendall WB; Headd JJ; Keedy DA; Immormino RM; Kapral GJ; Murray LW; Richardson JS; Richardson DC
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2010 Jan; 66(Pt 1):12-21. PubMed ID: 20057044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of detailed conformations suggests strategies for improving cryoEM models: Helix at lower resolution, ensembles, pre-refinement fixups, and validation at multi-residue length scale.
    Richardson JS; Williams CJ; Videau LL; Chen VB; Richardson DC
    J Struct Biol; 2018 Nov; 204(2):301-312. PubMed ID: 30107233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New tools in MolProbity validation: CaBLAM for CryoEM backbone, UnDowser to rethink "waters," and NGL Viewer to recapture online 3D graphics.
    Prisant MG; Williams CJ; Chen VB; Richardson JS; Richardson DC
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):315-329. PubMed ID: 31724275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The bad and the good of trends in model building and refinement for sparse-data regions: pernicious forms of overfitting versus good new tools and predictions.
    Richardson JS; Williams CJ; Chen VB; Prisant MG; Richardson DC
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2023 Dec; 79(Pt 12):1071-1078. PubMed ID: 37921807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Autofix for backward-fit sidechains: using MolProbity and real-space refinement to put misfits in their place.
    Headd JJ; Immormino RM; Keedy DA; Emsley P; Richardson DC; Richardson JS
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2009 Mar; 10(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 19002604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RCrane: semi-automated RNA model building.
    Keating KS; Pyle AM
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2012 Aug; 68(Pt 8):985-95. PubMed ID: 22868764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation.
    Williams CJ; Headd JJ; Moriarty NW; Prisant MG; Videau LL; Deis LN; Verma V; Keedy DA; Hintze BJ; Chen VB; Jain S; Lewis SM; Arendall WB; Snoeyink J; Adams PD; Lovell SC; Richardson JS; Richardson DC
    Protein Sci; 2018 Jan; 27(1):293-315. PubMed ID: 29067766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RNABC: forward kinematics to reduce all-atom steric clashes in RNA backbone.
    Wang X; Kapral G; Murray L; Richardson D; Richardson J; Snoeyink J
    J Math Biol; 2008 Jan; 56(1-2):253-78. PubMed ID: 17401565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RNA Structure Refinement Using the ERRASER-Phenix Pipeline.
    Chou FC; Echols N; Terwilliger TC; Das R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1320():269-82. PubMed ID: 26227049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances.
    Davis IW; Arendall WB; Richardson DC; Richardson JS
    Structure; 2006 Feb; 14(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 16472746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A test of enhancing model accuracy in high-throughput crystallography.
    Arendall WB; Tempel W; Richardson JS; Zhou W; Wang S; Davis IW; Liu ZJ; Rose JP; Carson WM; Luo M; Richardson DC; Wang BC
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2005; 6(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15965733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms.
    Word JM; Lovell SC; LaBean TH; Taylor HC; Zalis ME; Presley BK; Richardson JS; Richardson DC
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jan; 285(4):1711-33. PubMed ID: 9917407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational Methods for RNA Structure Validation and Improvement.
    Jain S; Richardson DC; Richardson JS
    Methods Enzymol; 2015; 558():181-212. PubMed ID: 26068742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction.
    Smith CA; Kortemme T
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Jul; 380(4):742-56. PubMed ID: 18547585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Algorithm for backrub motions in protein design.
    Georgiev I; Keedy D; Richardson JS; Richardson DC; Donald BR
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(13):i196-204. PubMed ID: 18586714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated electron-density sampling reveals widespread conformational polymorphism in proteins.
    Lang PT; Ng HL; Fraser JS; Corn JE; Echols N; Sales M; Holton JM; Alber T
    Protein Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1420-31. PubMed ID: 20499387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting pervasive errors in RNA crystallography through enumerative structure prediction.
    Chou FC; Sripakdeevong P; Dibrov SM; Hermann T; Das R
    Nat Methods; 2013 Jan; 10(1):74-6. PubMed ID: 23202432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molprobity's ultimate rotamer-library distributions for model validation.
    Hintze BJ; Lewis SM; Richardson JS; Richardson DC
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84(9):1177-89. PubMed ID: 27018641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Protein-Ligand Crystal Structure Models: Small Molecule and Peptide Ligands.
    Pozharski E; Deller MC; Rupp B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1607():611-625. PubMed ID: 28573591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.