These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29533504)
1. Evaluation of the McMahon Competence Assessment Instrument for Use with Midwifery Students During a Simulated Shoulder Dystocia. McMahon E; Jevitt C; Aronson B J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Mar; 63(2):221-226. PubMed ID: 29533504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modification of Obstetric Emergency Simulation Scenarios for Realism in a Home-Birth Setting. Komorowski J; Andrighetti T; Benton M J Midwifery Womens Health; 2017 Jan; 62(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 28002642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage simulations: student confidence in managing these complications. Andrighetti TP; Knestrick JM; Marowitz A; Martin C; Engstrom JL J Midwifery Womens Health; 2012; 57(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 22251913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Training less-experienced faculty improves reliability of skills assessment in cardiac surgery. Lou X; Lee R; Feins RH; Enter D; Hicks GL; Verrier ED; Fann JI J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2491-6.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25308119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the content and face validity of OSCE assessment marking criteria on an undergraduate midwifery programme: a quality initiative. Barry M; Bradshaw C; Noonan M Nurse Educ Pract; 2013 Sep; 13(5):477-80. PubMed ID: 23348056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulated patient training: Using inter-rater reliability to evaluate simulated patient consistency in nursing education. MacLean S; Geddes F; Kelly M; Della P Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Mar; 62():85-90. PubMed ID: 29306751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills: a reliable and valid scoring system. van der Heide PA; van Toledo-Eppinga L; van der Heide M; van der Lee JH Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 16987590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Video analysis of real-life shoulder dystocia to assess technical and non-technical performance. Hjorth-Hansen KR; Rosvig L; Hvidman L; Kierkegaard O; Uldbjerg N; Manser T; Brogaard L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Oct; 103(10):1985-1993. PubMed ID: 38925557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and piloting the Woman Centred Care Scale (WCCS). Brady S; Bogossian F; Gibbons K Women Birth; 2017 Jun; 30(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 27865817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emergency birth hybrid simulation with standardized patients in midwifery education: implementation and evaluation. Lindsay Miller J; Avery MD; Larson K; Woll A; VonAchen A; Mortenson A J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 25963413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A protocol for evaluating progressive levels of simulation fidelity in the development of technical skills, integrated performance and woman centred clinical assessment skills in undergraduate midwifery students. Brady S; Bogossian F; Gibbons K; Wells A; Lyon P; Bonney D; Barlow M; Jackson A BMC Med Educ; 2013 May; 13():72. PubMed ID: 23706037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Establishing Inter- and Intrarater Reliability for High-Stakes Testing Using Simulation. Kardong-Edgren S; Oermann MH; Rizzolo MA; Odom-Maryon T Nurs Educ Perspect; 2017; 38(2):63-68. PubMed ID: 29194298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The validity and reliability of methods to assess the competence to practise of pre-registration nursing and midwifery students. Norman IJ; Watson R; Murrells T; Calman L; Redfern S Int J Nurs Stud; 2002 Feb; 39(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 11755444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection). Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 28866350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The experiences of last-year student midwives with High-Fidelity Perinatal Simulation training: A qualitative descriptive study. Vermeulen J; Beeckman K; Turcksin R; Van Winkel L; Gucciardo L; Laubach M; Peersman W; Swinnen E Women Birth; 2017 Jun; 30(3):253-261. PubMed ID: 28341585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct Observation Assessment of Milestones: Problems with Reliability. Schott M; Kedia R; Promes SB; Swoboda T; O'Rourke K; Green W; Liu R; Stansfield B; Santen SA West J Emerg Med; 2015 Nov; 16(6):871-6. PubMed ID: 26594281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing women with acute physiological deterioration: student midwives performance in a simulated setting. Cooper S; Bulle B; Biro MA; Jones J; Miles M; Gilmour C; Buykx P; Boland R; Kinsman L; Scholes J; Endacott R Women Birth; 2012 Sep; 25(3):e27-36. PubMed ID: 21940231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of the "BRISK Scale," a brief observational measure of risk communication competence. Han PK; Joekes K; Mills G; Gutheil C; Smith K; Cochran NE; Elwyn G Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Dec; 99(12):2091-2094. PubMed ID: 27544016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appraisal of a scoring instrument for training and testing neonatal intubation skills. Bouwmeester RN; Binkhorst M; Yamada NK; Geurtzen R; van Heijst AFJ; Halamek LP; Draaisma JMT; Hogeveen M Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2019 Sep; 104(5):F521-F527. PubMed ID: 30504442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]