These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29534083)
21. Validation of the Greek Version of Comfort-B, FLACC, and BPS Scales in Critically Ill Children and Their Association with Clinical Severity. Tamvaki E; Efstratiou F; Nteli C; Matziou V; Pavlopoulou I; Myrianthefs P; Papathanassoglou E; Giannakopoulou M Pain Manag Nurs; 2020 Oct; 21(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 31862298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use? Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE Pain; 2015 Nov; 156(11):2132-2151. PubMed ID: 26207651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children. Babl FE; Crellin D; Cheng J; Sullivan TP; O'Sullivan R; Hutchinson A Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1281-96. PubMed ID: 23187981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment. Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S; Tait AR; Merkel S; Foster R; Krane EJ; Davis PJ Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):72-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validity of parent ratings as proxy measures of pain in children with cognitive impairment. Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S; Tait AR Pain Manag Nurs; 2005 Dec; 6(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 16337564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of nurse accuracy in rating procedural pain among pediatric burn patients using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale. Shen J; Giles SA; Kurtovic K; Fabia R; Besner GE; Wheeler KK; Xiang H; Groner JI Burns; 2017 Feb; 43(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 27576937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validity and reliability of two pain assessment tools in Brazilian children and adolescents. da Silva FC; Santos Thuler LC; de Leon-Casasola OA J Clin Nurs; 2011 Jul; 20(13-14):1842-8. PubMed ID: 21564357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months. Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Hutchinson A; Schuster T; Santamaria N; Babl FE BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016225. PubMed ID: 28882914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantification of Pain and Distress Associated With Intranasal Midazolam Administration in Children and Evaluation of Validity of Four Observational Measures. Tsze DS; Ieni M; Flores-Sanchez PL; Shen ST; Bregstein JS; O'Connell NC; Dayan PS Pediatr Emerg Care; 2021 Jan; 37(1):e17-e20. PubMed ID: 29794957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A Hebrew version of the FLACC scale: measurement of pain in non-verbal children]. Zaslansky R; Glasser S; Golobov A; Finkelstein I; Levi D; Keidan I Harefuah; 2006 Sep; 145(9):648-51, 704, 703. PubMed ID: 17078423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Scale for Pediatric Pain Assessment. Peng T; Qu S; Du Z; Chen Z; Xiao T; Chen R J Pain Res; 2023; 16():1185-1196. PubMed ID: 37064956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility and Clinical Utility of the Finnish Version of the FLACC Pain Scale in PICU. Lempinen H; Pölkki T; Kyngäs H; Kaakinen P J Pediatr Nurs; 2020; 55():211-216. PubMed ID: 32961384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection and assessment of postoperative pain in children with cognitive impairment: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Pizzinato A; Liguoro I; Pusiol A; Cogo P; Palese A; Vidal E Eur J Pain; 2022 May; 26(5):965-979. PubMed ID: 35271756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of the validation of existing behavioral pain and distress scales for use in the procedural setting. Crellin D; Sullivan TP; Babl FE; O'Sullivan R; Hutchinson A Paediatr Anaesth; 2007 Aug; 17(8):720-33. PubMed ID: 17596217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods caused minimal pain in 25 children: pain assessment with FPS-R, NRS, and r-FLACC. Skov ST; Bünger C; Li H; Vigh-Larsen M; Rölfing JD Spine Deform; 2020 Aug; 8(4):763-770. PubMed ID: 32170659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale, the MBPS and the Observer Applied Visual Analogue Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain. Crellin D; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE J Pain Res; 2021; 14():881-892. PubMed ID: 33833566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reliability and Feasibility of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale-Korean Version (PAINAD-K). Kwon SH; Cho YS; Kim H Pain Manag Nurs; 2021 Oct; 22(5):660-667. PubMed ID: 33676858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: a comparison with the child's self-report. Willis MH; Merkel SI; Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S Pediatr Nurs; 2003; 29(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 12836995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cross-validation of a composite pain scale for preschool children within 24 hours of surgery. Suraseranivongse S; Santawat U; Kraiprasit K; Petcharatana S; Prakkamodom S; Muntraporn N Br J Anaesth; 2001 Sep; 87(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 11517123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Observational visual analog scale in pediatric pain assessment: useful tool or good riddance? van Dijk M; Koot HM; Saad HH; Tibboel D; Passchier J Clin J Pain; 2002; 18(5):310-6. PubMed ID: 12218502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]