These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29534785)

  • 1. Impact of physician payment mechanism on emergency department operational performance.
    Innes GD; Scheuermeyer FX; Marsden J; Sing CK; Kalla D; Stenstrom R; Law M; Grafstein E
    CJEM; 2018 Mar; 20(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 29534785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do physician-payment mechanisms affect hospital utilization? A study of Health Service Organizations in Ontario.
    Hutchison B; Birch S; Hurley J; Lomas J; Stratford-Devai F
    CMAJ; 1996 Mar; 154(5):653-61. PubMed ID: 8603321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blended payment methods in physician organizations under managed care.
    Robinson JC
    JAMA; 1999 Oct; 282(13):1258-63. PubMed ID: 10517429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Service production and contract choice in primary physician services.
    Sørensen RJ; Grytten J
    Health Policy; 2003 Oct; 66(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 14499167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of physician payment methods on raising the efficiency of the healthcare system: an international comparison.
    Simoens S; Giuffrida A
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2004; 3(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 15702939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation.
    Glazier RH; Klein-Geltink J; Kopp A; Sibley LM
    CMAJ; 2009 May; 180(11):E72-81. PubMed ID: 19468106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary care services and emergency department visits in blended fee-for-service and blended capitation models: evidence from Ontario, Canada.
    Hong M; Devlin RA; Zaric GS; Thind A; Sarma S
    Eur J Health Econ; 2024 Apr; 25(3):363-377. PubMed ID: 37154832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Team-Based Care on Emergency Department Use.
    Kiran T; Moineddin R; Kopp A; Glazier RH
    Ann Fam Med; 2022; 20(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 35074764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does a year make a difference? Changes in physician satisfaction and perception in an increasingly capitated environment.
    Nadler ES; Sims S; Tyrance PH; Fairchild DG; Brennan TA; Bates DW
    Am J Med; 1999 Jul; 107(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 10403351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of payment method on clinical decision-making: physician responses to clinical scenarios.
    Shen J; Andersen R; Brook R; Kominski G; Albert PS; Wenger N
    Med Care; 2004 Mar; 42(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15076830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The alignment and blending of payment incentives within physician organizations.
    Robinson JC; Shortell SM; Li R; Casalino LP; Rundall T
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Oct; 39(5):1589-606. PubMed ID: 15333124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician responses to fee-for-service and capitation payment.
    Stearns SC; Wolfe BL; Kindig DA
    Inquiry; 1992; 29(4):416-25. PubMed ID: 1473865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors that influence specialist physician preferences for fee-for-service and salary-based payment models: A qualitative study.
    Ogundeji YK; Quinn A; Lunney M; Chong C; Chew D; Danso G; Duggan S; Edwards A; Hopkin G; Senior P; Sumner G; Williams J; Manns B
    Health Policy; 2021 Apr; 125(4):442-449. PubMed ID: 33509635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician Payment Contracts in the Presence of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection: The Theory and Its Application in Ontario.
    Kantarevic J; Kralj B
    Health Econ; 2016 Oct; 25(10):1326-40. PubMed ID: 26239311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives.
    Robinson JC
    Milbank Q; 2001; 79(2):149-77, III. PubMed ID: 11439463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of capitated and fee-for-service remuneration on physician decision making in gynecology.
    Ransom SB; McNeeley SG; Kruger ML; Doot G; Cotton DB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 87(5 Pt 1):707-10. PubMed ID: 8677071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of Diabetes Care in Blended Fee-for-Service and Blended Capitation Payment Systems.
    Bamimore MA; Devlin RA; Zaric GS; Garg AX; Sarma S
    Can J Diabetes; 2021 Apr; 45(3):261-268.e11. PubMed ID: 33162371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physician remuneration methods: the need for change and flexibility.
    Wright CJ
    CMAJ; 1996 Mar; 154(5):678-80. PubMed ID: 8603324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sorting into payment schemes and medical treatment: A laboratory experiment.
    Brosig-Koch J; Kairies-Schwarz N; Kokot J
    Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26 Suppl 3():52-65. PubMed ID: 29285865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are patients with longer emergency department wait times less likely to consent to research?
    Limkakeng AT; Glickman SW; Shofer F; Mani G; Drake W; Freeman D; Ascher S; Pietrobon R; Cairns CB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 19(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 22506943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.