These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29534813)

  • 61. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.
    Bhama AR; Obias V; Welch KB; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1576-84. PubMed ID: 26169638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition!
    Rao PP
    World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):537-541. PubMed ID: 29427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
    Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Robotic bariatric surgery: A general review of the current status.
    Jung MK; Hagen ME; Buchs NC; Buehler LH; Morel P
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28544251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas.
    Sebajang H; Trudeau P; Dougall A; Hegge S; McKinley C; Anvari M
    Surg Endosc; 2006 Sep; 20(9):1389-93. PubMed ID: 16823656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Al-Mazrou AM; Chiuzan C; Kiran RP
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1415-1421. PubMed ID: 28685223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
    Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Robotic single docking total colectomy for ulcerative colitis: First experience with a novel technique.
    Roviello F; Piagnerelli R; Ferrara F; Scheiterle M; De Franco L; Marrelli D
    Int J Surg; 2015 Sep; 21():63-7. PubMed ID: 26207692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Single-incision robotic colectomy (SIRC): Current status and future directions.
    Juo YY; Luka S; Obias V
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 112(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 26133116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions.
    Chan YY; Durbin-Johnson B; Sturm RM; Kurzrock EA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Feb; 13(1):49.e1-49.e6. PubMed ID: 28288777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Incisional and port-site hernias following robotic colorectal surgery.
    Harr JN; Juo YY; Luka S; Agarwal S; Brody F; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3505-10. PubMed ID: 26541723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Expert consensus on robotic surgery for colorectal cancer (2015 edition).
    Xu J; Qin X
    Chin J Cancer; 2016 Feb; 35():23. PubMed ID: 26916742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Outcome comparisons between high-volume robotic and laparoscopic surgeons in a large healthcare system.
    Rashidi L; Neighorn C; Bastawrous A
    Am J Surg; 2017 May; 213(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28408112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [First national survey on use of robotics for visceral surgery in Germany].
    Kissler HJ; Bauschke A; Settmacher U
    Chirurg; 2016 Aug; 87(8):669-75. PubMed ID: 27324496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Role of robotic surgery in colorectal resections for cancer.
    Bertani E; Chiappa A; Ubiali P; Fiore B; Corbellini C; Cossu ML; Minicozzi A; Andreoni B
    Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol; 2012 Sep; 58(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 22971630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP database analysis.
    Harr JN; Haskins IN; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 28900886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations.
    Casillas MA; Leichtle SW; Wahl WL; Lampman RM; Welch KB; Wellock T; Madden EB; Cleary RK
    Am J Surg; 2014 Jul; 208(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24239530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy and open colectomy when compared by operative duration for the procedure.
    Philip S; Jackson N; Mittal V
    Am J Surg; 2018 Apr; 215(4):577-580. PubMed ID: 28629609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Single- versus dual-console robotic surgery: dual improves the educational experience for trainees.
    Goonewardene SS; Brown M; Challacombe B
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1337-9. PubMed ID: 26767531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Current controversies in colorectal surgery: the way to resolve uncertainty and move forward.
    Rosenberg J; Fischer A; Haglind E;
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 22122825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.