BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29535149)

  • 1. SvABA: genome-wide detection of structural variants and indels by local assembly.
    Wala JA; Bandopadhayay P; Greenwald NF; O'Rourke R; Sharpe T; Stewart C; Schumacher S; Li Y; Weischenfeldt J; Yao X; Nusbaum C; Campbell P; Getz G; Meyerson M; Zhang CZ; Imielinski M; Beroukhim R
    Genome Res; 2018 Apr; 28(4):581-591. PubMed ID: 29535149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of genomic indels and structural variations using split reads.
    Zhang ZD; Du J; Lam H; Abyzov A; Urban AE; Snyder M; Gerstein M
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Jul; 12():375. PubMed ID: 21787423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data.
    Joe S; Park JL; Kim J; Kim S; Park JH; Yeo MK; Lee D; Yang JO; Kim SY
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):318. PubMed ID: 38549092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LinkedSV for detection of mosaic structural variants from linked-read exome and genome sequencing data.
    Fang L; Kao C; Gonzalez MV; Mafra FA; Pellegrino da Silva R; Li M; Wenzel SS; Wimmer K; Hakonarson H; Wang K
    Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5585. PubMed ID: 31811119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HySA: a Hybrid Structural variant Assembly approach using next-generation and single-molecule sequencing technologies.
    Fan X; Chaisson M; Nakhleh L; Chen K
    Genome Res; 2017 May; 27(5):793-800. PubMed ID: 28104618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-platform discovery of haplotype-resolved structural variation in human genomes.
    Chaisson MJP; Sanders AD; Zhao X; Malhotra A; Porubsky D; Rausch T; Gardner EJ; Rodriguez OL; Guo L; Collins RL; Fan X; Wen J; Handsaker RE; Fairley S; Kronenberg ZN; Kong X; Hormozdiari F; Lee D; Wenger AM; Hastie AR; Antaki D; Anantharaman T; Audano PA; Brand H; Cantsilieris S; Cao H; Cerveira E; Chen C; Chen X; Chin CS; Chong Z; Chuang NT; Lambert CC; Church DM; Clarke L; Farrell A; Flores J; Galeev T; Gorkin DU; Gujral M; Guryev V; Heaton WH; Korlach J; Kumar S; Kwon JY; Lam ET; Lee JE; Lee J; Lee WP; Lee SP; Li S; Marks P; Viaud-Martinez K; Meiers S; Munson KM; Navarro FCP; Nelson BJ; Nodzak C; Noor A; Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou S; Pang AWC; Qiu Y; Rosanio G; Ryan M; Stütz A; Spierings DCJ; Ward A; Welch AE; Xiao M; Xu W; Zhang C; Zhu Q; Zheng-Bradley X; Lowy E; Yakneen S; McCarroll S; Jun G; Ding L; Koh CL; Ren B; Flicek P; Chen K; Gerstein MB; Kwok PY; Lansdorp PM; Marth GT; Sebat J; Shi X; Bashir A; Ye K; Devine SE; Talkowski ME; Mills RE; Marschall T; Korbel JO; Eichler EE; Lee C
    Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1784. PubMed ID: 30992455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. iSVP: an integrated structural variant calling pipeline from high-throughput sequencing data.
    Mimori T; Nariai N; Kojima K; Takahashi M; Ono A; Sato Y; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Nagasaki M
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S8. PubMed ID: 24564972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A high-quality human reference panel reveals the complexity and distribution of genomic structural variants.
    Hehir-Kwa JY; Marschall T; Kloosterman WP; Francioli LC; Baaijens JA; Dijkstra LJ; Abdellaoui A; Koval V; Thung DT; Wardenaar R; Renkens I; Coe BP; Deelen P; de Ligt J; Lameijer EW; van Dijk F; Hormozdiari F; ; Uitterlinden AG; van Duijn CM; Eichler EE; de Bakker PI; Swertz MA; Wijmenga C; van Ommen GB; Slagboom PE; Boomsma DI; Schönhuth A; Ye K; Guryev V
    Nat Commun; 2016 Oct; 7():12989. PubMed ID: 27708267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection and visualization of complex structural variants from long reads.
    Stephens Z; Wang C; Iyer RK; Kocher JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 20):508. PubMed ID: 30577744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis.
    Rausch T; Zichner T; Schlattl A; Stütz AM; Benes V; Korbel JO
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):i333-i339. PubMed ID: 22962449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Next generation mapping reveals novel large genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer.
    Jaratlerdsiri W; Chan EKF; Petersen DC; Yang C; Croucher PI; Bornman MSR; Sheth P; Hayes VM
    Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23588-23602. PubMed ID: 28423598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole-genome sequencing with long reads reveals complex structure and origin of structural variation in human genetic variations and somatic mutations in cancer.
    Fujimoto A; Wong JH; Yoshii Y; Akiyama S; Tanaka A; Yagi H; Shigemizu D; Nakagawa H; Mizokami M; Shimada M
    Genome Med; 2021 Apr; 13(1):65. PubMed ID: 33910608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeksv: an accurate tool for somatic structural variation and virus integration detection.
    Liang Y; Qiu K; Liao B; Zhu W; Huang X; Li L; Chen X; Li K
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):184-191. PubMed ID: 27634948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
    Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expectations and blind spots for structural variation detection from long-read assemblies and short-read genome sequencing technologies.
    Zhao X; Collins RL; Lee WP; Weber AM; Jun Y; Zhu Q; Weisburd B; Huang Y; Audano PA; Wang H; Walker M; Lowther C; Fu J; ; Gerstein MB; Devine SE; Marschall T; Korbel JO; Eichler EE; Chaisson MJP; Lee C; Mills RE; Brand H; Talkowski ME
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):919-928. PubMed ID: 33789087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dysgu: efficient structural variant calling using short or long reads.
    Cleal K; Baird DM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 May; 50(9):e53. PubMed ID: 35100420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oxford Nanopore and Bionano Genomics technologies evaluation for plant structural variation detection.
    Canaguier A; Guilbaud R; Denis E; Magdelenat G; Belser C; Istace B; Cruaud C; Wincker P; Le Paslier MC; Faivre-Rampant P; Barbe V
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):317. PubMed ID: 35448948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. nanotatoR: a tool for enhanced annotation of genomic structural variants.
    Bhattacharya S; Barseghyan H; Délot EC; Vilain E
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):10. PubMed ID: 33407088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geographic distribution and adaptive significance of genomic structural variants: an anthropological genetics perspective.
    Eaaswarkhanth M; Pavlidis P; Gokcumen O
    Hum Biol; 2014; 86(4):260-75. PubMed ID: 25959693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precise characterization of somatic complex structural variations from tumor/control paired long-read sequencing data with nanomonsv.
    Shiraishi Y; Koya J; Chiba K; Okada A; Arai Y; Saito Y; Shibata T; Kataoka K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Aug; 51(14):e74. PubMed ID: 37336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.