466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29535314)
1. Benchmarking common quantification strategies for large-scale phosphoproteomics.
Hogrebe A; von Stechow L; Bekker-Jensen DB; Weinert BT; Kelstrup CD; Olsen JV
Nat Commun; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1045. PubMed ID: 29535314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking stable isotope labeling based quantitative proteomics.
Altelaar AF; Frese CK; Preisinger C; Hennrich ML; Schram AW; Timmers HT; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
J Proteomics; 2013 Aug; 88():14-26. PubMed ID: 23085607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of elemental mass spectrometry in phosphoproteomic applications.
Maes E; Tirez K; Baggerman G; Valkenborg D; Schoofs L; Encinar JR; Mertens I
Mass Spectrom Rev; 2016; 35(3):350-60. PubMed ID: 25139451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiplexed quantitative phosphoproteomics of cell line and tissue samples.
Kreuzer J; Edwards A; Haas W
Methods Enzymol; 2019; 626():41-65. PubMed ID: 31606085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining Metabolic ¹⁵N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome.
Thomas M; Huck N; Hoehenwarter W; Conrath U; Beckers GJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1306():81-96. PubMed ID: 25930695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peptide Labeling Using Isobaric Tagging Reagents for Quantitative Phosphoproteomics.
Cheng L; Pisitkun T; Knepper MA; Hoffert JD
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1355():53-70. PubMed ID: 26584918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advances in the analysis of protein phosphorylation.
Paradela A; Albar JP
J Proteome Res; 2008 May; 7(5):1809-18. PubMed ID: 18327898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MS3-IDQ: Utilizing MS3 Spectra beyond Quantification Yields Increased Coverage of the Phosphoproteome in Isobaric Tag Experiments.
Berberich MJ; Paulo JA; Everley RA
J Proteome Res; 2018 Apr; 17(4):1741-1747. PubMed ID: 29461835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides.
Tsai CF; Smith JS; Eiger DS; Martin K; Liu T; Smith RD; Shi T; Rajagopal S; Jacobs JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():247-257. PubMed ID: 33687720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tandem Mass Tag Labeling Facilitates Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides.
Tsai CF; Smith JS; Krajewski K; Zhao R; Moghieb AM; Nicora CD; Xiong X; Moore RJ; Liu T; Smith RD; Jacobs JM; Rajagopal S; Shi T
Anal Chem; 2019 Sep; 91(18):11606-11613. PubMed ID: 31418558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Assessment of Quantification Methods for Tumor Tissue Phosphoproteomics.
Zhang Y; Dreyer B; Govorukhina N; Heberle AM; Končarević S; Krisp C; Opitz CA; Pfänder P; Bischoff R; Schlüter H; Kwiatkowski M; Thedieck K; Horvatovich PL
Anal Chem; 2022 Aug; 94(31):10893-10906. PubMed ID: 35880733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous quantification of protein phosphorylation sites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics: a linear algebra approach for isobaric phosphopeptides.
Xu F; Yang T; Sheng Y; Zhong T; Yang M; Chen Y
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5452-60. PubMed ID: 25403019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Quantifying DNA Damage-Induced Phosphorylation.
Borisova ME; Wagner SA; Beli P
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1599():215-227. PubMed ID: 28477122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SILAC-Based Quantitative Phosphoproteomics in Yeast.
Hernáez ML; Gil C
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2603():103-115. PubMed ID: 36370273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal analytical strategies for sensitive and quantitative phosphoproteomics using TMT-based multiplexing.
Koenig C; Martinez-Val A; Franciosa G; Olsen JV
Proteomics; 2022 Oct; 22(19-20):e2100245. PubMed ID: 35713889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SPECHT - single-stage phosphopeptide enrichment and stable-isotope chemical tagging: quantitative phosphoproteomics of insulin action in muscle.
Kettenbach AN; Sano H; Keller SR; Lienhard GE; Gerber SA
J Proteomics; 2015 Jan; 114():48-60. PubMed ID: 25463755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep Coverage of Global Protein Expression and Phosphorylation in Breast Tumor Cell Lines Using TMT 10-plex Isobaric Labeling.
Huang FK; Zhang G; Lawlor K; Nazarian A; Philip J; Tempst P; Dephoure N; Neubert TA
J Proteome Res; 2017 Mar; 16(3):1121-1132. PubMed ID: 28102081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the Efficiency of Phosphopeptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Hsu CC; Xue L; Arrington JV; Wang P; Paez Paez JS; Zhou Y; Zhu JK; Tao WA
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jun; 28(6):1127-1135. PubMed ID: 28283928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent developments in mass spectrometry-based quantitative phosphoproteomics.
Smith JC; Figeys D
Biochem Cell Biol; 2008 Apr; 86(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 18443627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Undesirable charge-enhancement of isobaric tagged phosphopeptides leads to reduced identification efficiency.
Thingholm TE; Palmisano G; Kjeldsen F; Larsen MR
J Proteome Res; 2010 Aug; 9(8):4045-52. PubMed ID: 20515019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
