150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29536195)
1. Comparison of different methods of DNA recovery and PCR amplification in STR profiling of casings-a retrospective study.
Radojicic V; Keckarevic Markovic M; Puac F; Kecmanovic M; Keckarevic D
Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 29536195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative performance of AmpFLSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR amplification kit and QIAGEN® Investigator® IDplex Plus kit.
Mattayat D; Kitpipit T; Phetpeng S; Asawutmangkul W; Thanakiatkrai P
Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):468-474. PubMed ID: 27914554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forensic DNA typing strategy of degraded DNA on discarded cigarette ends using the AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler®, Identifiler® Plus and MiniFiler™ PCR amplification kits.
Ip SC; Lin SW; Li C; Lai KM
Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 25002050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developmental validation of the AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR Amplification Kit: an established multiplex assay with improved performance.
Wang DY; Chang CW; Lagacé RE; Calandro LM; Hennessy LK
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):453-65. PubMed ID: 22074494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance between the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler and AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kits in the Kuwaiti population.
Alenizi MA; Goodwin W; Hadi S; Alenizi HH; Altamar KA; Alsikel MS
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):350-2. PubMed ID: 19187459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of metal ions and DNA recovery from the surface of fired and unfired brass ammunition to improve STR profiling.
Czado N; Houston R; Hughes S
Int J Legal Med; 2024 Jul; 138(4):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 38433135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of fingerprint samples, testing various conditions, for forensic DNA identification.
Ostojic L; Wurmbach E
Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28063583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR Amplification Kit: a MiniSTR multiplex for the analysis of degraded and/or PCR inhibited DNA.
Mulero JJ; Chang CW; Lagacé RE; Wang DY; Bas JL; McMahon TP; Hennessy LK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):838-52. PubMed ID: 18540972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concordance study between the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR amplification kit and conventional STR typing kits.
Hill CR; Kline MC; Mulero JJ; Lagacé RE; Chang CW; Hennessy LK; Butler JM
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):870-3. PubMed ID: 17553078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison Among Three Multiplex Y-STR Profiling Kits for Sexual Assault Cases.
Ferreira-Silva B; Fonseca-Cardoso M; Porto MJ; Magalhães T; Cainé L
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1836-1840. PubMed ID: 29464703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative and qualitative study of STR DNA from ethanol and formalin fixed tissues.
Alqaydi M; Roy R
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():18-29. PubMed ID: 26963697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation and comparative analysis of direct amplification of STRs using PowerPlex® 18D and Identifiler® Direct systems.
Myers BA; King JL; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 22405516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between DNA degradation ratios and the number of loci detectable by STR kits in extremely old seminal stain samples.
Hara M; Nakanishi H; Takahashi S; Nagai A; Yamamoto T; Yoneyama K; Saito K; Takada A
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Sep; 17(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 26054579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA profiles generated from a range of touched sample types.
Martin B; Blackie R; Taylor D; Linacre A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():13-19. PubMed ID: 29886388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time since contact influences DNA profiling success of cartridges and fired cartridge casings.
Winnepenninckx A; Verhoeven E; Vermeulen S; Jeurissen B; Borgers E; Bekaert B
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Nov; 340():111474. PubMed ID: 36174383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Accelerated Analytical Process for the Development of STR Profiles for Casework Samples.
Laurin N; Frégeau CJ
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):983-9. PubMed ID: 25782346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a modified p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde solution for touch DNA analysis and its application to STR analysis.
Yano R; Shimoda O; Okitsu T; Sakurada M; Ueno Y
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():86-92. PubMed ID: 30391625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
