These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29537346)

  • 1. Recognition for Reviewers: PUBLONS!
    Cuellar NG
    J Transcult Nurs; 2018 May; 29(3):221. PubMed ID: 29537346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it.
    Frishauf P
    Medscape J Med; 2008; 10(11):267. PubMed ID: 19099017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
    Thistlethwaite J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical problems may preclude realization of this proposal.
    Della Mea V
    J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(3):E15. PubMed ID: 11720938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Benefits of Being a "Peer-Reviewer".
    Cuellar NG
    J Transcult Nurs; 2024 May; 35(3):185. PubMed ID: 38651822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publons.com: credit where credit is due.
    Sammour T
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Jun; 86(6):512-3. PubMed ID: 27252137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post Publication Peer Review: Is it Coming to Your Nursing Journal?
    Pierson CA
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2016 Jun; 28(6):286. PubMed ID: 27273106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trouble with peer review.
    Rocha B
    Nat Immunol; 2001 Apr; 2(4):277. PubMed ID: 11276191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The history and practice of peer review.
    Chapelle FH
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(1):1. PubMed ID: 24266884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis.
    Ahmed S; Yessirkepov M
    J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Jun; 36(25):e169. PubMed ID: 34184435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review week 2017.
    Pierson CA
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2017 Sep; 29(9):500. PubMed ID: 28877425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ancient texts to PubMed: a brief history of the peer-review process.
    Farrell PR; Magida Farrell L; Farrell MK
    J Perinatol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):13-15. PubMed ID: 27853323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review: A critical cog in the scholarship wheel.
    Zavod RM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29248064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Value and Process of Peer Review.
    Dunn D
    AORN J; 2018 Jun; 107(6):661-664. PubMed ID: 29851050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Publons - How Reviewers' Work Is Made Visible].
    Lang GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2018 Nov; 235(11):1209-1210. PubMed ID: 30458559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing?
    Berger E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 16435419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Would you buy a used car from this editor?
    Nazarian LN
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1107-8. PubMed ID: 23804332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why we need a golden rule for peer review.
    Tuckett AG; Kangasniemi M
    Nurs Ethics; 2017 Dec; 24(8):875-877. PubMed ID: 29224549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
    Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
    J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review.
    Cotton P
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(23):2775-8. PubMed ID: 8133598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.