These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Reviewers: The unsung heroes of publication. Natarajan S Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 63(3):179. PubMed ID: 25971161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New Online Manuscript Submission System of Balkan Medical Journal. Koçak Z; Çalıyurt O Balkan Med J; 2019 Jan; 36(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 30563308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Preprints: Facilitating early discovery, access, and feedback. Maggio LA; Artino AR; Driessen EW Perspect Med Educ; 2018 Oct; 7(5):287-289. PubMed ID: 30218322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication. Muir-Cochrane E Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts. Balistreri WF J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Track and Verify Your Peer Review With Publons. Malchesky PS Artif Organs; 2017 Mar; 41(3):217. PubMed ID: 28281285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Need for Formal Training in the Peer Review Process and Role of Publons Academy. Rathore FA; Farooq F J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Jan; 28(1):78-79. PubMed ID: 29290202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Der Orthopäde and the impact factor]. Kohn D; Ewerbeck V Orthopade; 2015 Oct; 44(10):741. PubMed ID: 26376985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Funding should recognize the value of peer review. Dominiczak MH Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6919):111. PubMed ID: 12520276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Why are peer reviewers thinning out, and are there ways to enrich the peer pool? Teixeira da Silva JA J Sci Med Sport; 2023 Jul; 26(7):336-337. PubMed ID: 37479348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Peer review and Publons - enhancements for the reviewer. Citrome L Int J Clin Pract; 2016 May; 70(5):364. PubMed ID: 27121157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions. Barroga EF J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large. Vinny PW; Vishnu VY; Lal V J Neurol Sci; 2016 Apr; 363():119-20. PubMed ID: 27000235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals. Azer SA; Ramani S; Peterson R Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 22643022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Peer review in a post-eprints world: a proposal. Till JE J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(3):E14. PubMed ID: 11720937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]