These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29538278)

  • 1. Going Off Grid: Modeling an Automated Record Search to Process Electronically Reported Reactive Nontreponemal Syphilis Tests.
    Matthias J; Keller G; Cha S; Wilson C; Peterman TA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Oct; 45(10):655-659. PubMed ID: 29538278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Automated Processing of Electronically Reported Serological Tests for Syphilis Using Current and Historical Syphilis Results Compared With Traditional Reactor Grid Processing in Florida.
    Matthias J; Khan AM; Craze K; Karki S; Newman DR
    Sex Transm Dis; 2024 Jun; 51(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 38372524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reactor Grids for Prioritizing Syphilis Investigations: Are Primary Syphilis Cases Being Missed?
    Cha S; Matthias JM; Rahman M; Schillinger JA; Furness BW; Pugsley RA; Kidd S; Bernstein KT; Peterman TA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Oct; 45(10):648-654. PubMed ID: 29528995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Automated Syphilis Serology Record Search and Review Algorithm to Prioritize Investigations by Health Departments.
    Karki S; Peterman TA; Johnson K; Hennessy RR; Matthias J; Wilson C; Mishra N; Weinstock H
    Sex Transm Dis; 2021 Dec; 48(12):909-914. PubMed ID: 34091581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
    Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency and Characteristics of Biological False-Positive Test Results for Syphilis Reported in Florida and New York City, USA, 2013 to 2017.
    Matthias J; Klingler EJ; Schillinger JA; Keller G; Wilson C; Peterman TA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 31462551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limited efficacy of nontreponemal test combined with treponemal test in the initial syphilis screening algorithm.
    Gambiez C; Garet C; Choquet M; Decroix V; Pluquet E; Guiheneuf R; Castelain S
    J Med Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 68(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 30570479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic Assessment of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Screening in a High Prevalence Population.
    Buono SA; Basurto-Davila R; Godwin HA; Green NM
    Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Dec; 45(12):834-841. PubMed ID: 29870503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Web Application to Facilitate Syphilis Reactor Grid Evaluations.
    Avoundjian T; Khosropour CM; Golden MR; Barbee LA; Dombrowski JC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Feb; 45(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 28876285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The tale of two serologic tests to screen for syphilis--treponemal and nontreponemal: does the order matter?
    Owusu-Edusei K; Koski KA; Ballard RC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 May; 38(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 21183862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do women with persistently negative nontreponemal test results transmit syphilis during pregnancy?
    Peterman TA; Newman DR; Davis D; Su JR
    Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Apr; 40(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 23486496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of Traditional and Reverse-Algorithm Syphilis Screening in Laboratory Practice: A Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Syphilis Serology Proficiency Testing Program.
    Rhoads DD; Genzen JR; Bashleben CP; Faix JD; Ansari MQ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jan; 141(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 27763779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Treponemal Assay Signal Strength Cutoff Ratios To Predict Syphilis Infection.
    Bristow CC; Klausner JD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis?
    Binnicker MJ
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2012 Feb; 25(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 22156894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of syphilis reactor grids: optimizing impact.
    Schaffzin JK; Koumans EH; Kahn RH; Markowitz LE
    Sex Transm Dis; 2003 Sep; 30(9):700-6. PubMed ID: 12972793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection.
    Gratzer B; Pohl D; Hotton AL
    Sex Transm Dis; 2014 May; 41(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 24722379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms.
    Owusu-Edusei K; Peterman TA; Ballard RC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jan; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20739911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management.
    Tong ML; Lin LR; Liu LL; Zhang HL; Huang SJ; Chen YY; Guo XJ; Xi Y; Liu L; Chen FY; Zhang YF; Zhang Q; Yang TC
    Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Apr; 58(8):1116-24. PubMed ID: 24550376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of a novel dual treponemal/nontreponemal point-of-care test for syphilis as a tool to distinguish active from past treated infection.
    Causer LM; Kaldor JM; Conway DP; Leslie DE; Denham I; Karapanagiotidis T; Ryan C; Wand H; Anderson DA; Robertson PW; McNulty AM; Donovan B; Fairley CK; Guy RJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2015 Jul; 61(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25810288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The footprint of old syphilis: using a reverse screening algorithm for syphilis testing in a U.S. Geographic Information Systems-Based Community Outreach Program.
    Goswami ND; Stout JE; Miller WC; Hecker EJ; Cox GM; Norton BL; Sena AC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Nov; 40(11):839-41. PubMed ID: 24113403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.