These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2953857)

  • 1. Detecting letters in continuous text: effects of display size.
    Healy AF; Oliver WL; McNamara TP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 2953857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the boundaries of reading units across ages and reading levels.
    Cunningham TF; Healy AF; Kanengiser N; Chizzick L; Willitts RL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1988 Apr; 45(2):175-208. PubMed ID: 3361269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Context-dependent migrations in visual word perception.
    van der Velde F; van der Heijden AH; Schreuder R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 2522523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.
    Johnson NF; Allen PA; Strand TL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 2761405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.
    Grainger J; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 2304817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latency dependence of word-initial letter integration by the saccadic system.
    Doré K; Beauvillain C
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 9158327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multistream model of visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Kaut KP; Canfield A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 19304618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the boundaries of reading units: letter detection in misspelled words.
    Healy AF; Drewnowski A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):413-26. PubMed ID: 6223980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.
    Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not?
    Koriat A; Norman J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 2522525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.
    Grainger J; O'Regan JK; Jacobs AM; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 1549424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: evidence from eye movements when reading Thai.
    Winskel H; Perea M; Ratitamkul T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1522-36. PubMed ID: 22502779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan?
    Johnson NF; Carnot MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letter migration in word perception.
    Mozer MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):531-46. PubMed ID: 6224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.